So, the White House Just Released Numbers on Trump's Tax Cuts. What They...
Wait, Mamdani Got Cozy With Another Terrorist at a Public Event. The Gracie...
Did You See the Lead Reporter Behind That CNN Article on the NYC...
Tennessee Bill Would Place Foster Children In Detention Even If They Haven't Been...
This State Is About to End Government-Sponsored Kidnapping
Federal Judge Puts Another Snag in Trump Admin's Deportation Efforts
Trump Asked Major GOP Donors Who They Want to Succeed Him. This Is...
Left-Wing Activists Are Training Juries to Sabotage Trump DOJ Cases
A Veteran Had No Family at His Funeral, So America Came Instead
IRS Docs Reveal Jennifer Siebel Newsom Reportedly Pocketed Millions From Her 'Gender Stere...
Steve Witkoff Reveals Just How Much Weapons-Grade Uranium Iran Had Before Operation Epic...
Parents of Fallen US Soldiers in the Middle East Had One Message for...
Senator Thune Blasts Democrats for Failing at Basic Duties of Government As DHS...
Oil Price Crashes As President Trump Urges Tankers Into the Strait of Hormuz
That Thing the Left Says Never Happens Just Happened Again
OPINION

Geithner Has the hair, But He's No Model

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Geithner Has the hair, But He's No Model

When people hear the word “model” they instinctively think of a tall, graceful, female   marching down the runway as the music blares, the flashbulbs pop, and the audience gazes in awe. 

Advertisement

If you’re a Keynesian, however, the word “model” brings to mind something completely different. 

The day after the Federal Reserve’s announcement of Operation Twist and the financial market’s response to “significant downside risk,” the Keynesians are out in full force.  First, appearing on Bloomberg were two former Fed officials who applauded the Fed’s actions by saying it probably wouldn’t help, but if it could add a few hundred thousand jobs, then why not. 

When pressed as to how it would add those jobs, they responded by saying “many economist were consulted, and their models said it would happen.” 

Yeah, right

Next, we heard from analysts and pundits from Wall Street on CNBC, saying the action by the Fed created an overreaction and worldwide selling across the board in every asset class except treasuries. 

They also said this would obviously create a wonderful stock buying opportunity fairly soon.  Once again, when pressed as to why, the analysts and pundits reverted back to their standard response. 

Stating they observed their models over time “this is how we should respond.” 

Great advice! 

Finally, the man I’ve been waiting to hear from, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, chimed in by applauding the Fed’s actions and then condemning China for their currency, scolding the Europeans for not taking on more debt, and belittling Congress for its proverbial breakdown. 

Advertisement

As to why these things should be done his way, little Timmy put his hands out in his inevitable style, looked down, then looked up, and said over his elevated nose “the models said so.” 

Economic success is very simple to measure; it means more jobs and housing stability.  The success of the Keynesian models has continued to come up way short.  It doesn’t take an economist, a CFP, or even a young child who has few dollars to understand that absolutely none of the modeling has worked. 

Please, let’s all come to one conclusion. 

When you hear the term “model,” forget Keynes and think Tyra Banks.

Geithner has the hair for it, but he’s no model.     

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement