Pre-Election Special SALE: 60% Off VIP Membership
BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules on Whether Virginia Can Remove Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls
Tim Walz's Gaming Session With Ocasio-Cortez Was a Trainwreck
Oregon Predicates Request to Judge on Self-Delusion
GDP Report Shows Economy 'Weaker Than Expected'
How Trump Plans to Help Compensate Victims of 'Migrant Crime'
NRCC Blasts the Left's Voter Suppression Efforts in Battleground Districts
Watch Trump's Reaction to Finding Out Biden Called His Supporters 'Garbage'
26 Republican AGs Join Virginia in Petitioning SCOTUS to Intervene in Voter Registration...
There Was a Vile, Violent Attack in Chicago, and the Media's Been Silent....
One Red State Just Acquired a Massive Amount of Land to Secure Its...
Poll Out of Texas Shows That Harris Rally Sure Didn't Work for Colin...
This Hollywood Actor Is Persuading Christian Men to Vote for Kamala Harris
Is the Trump Campaign Over-Confident?
Is This Really How the Kamala HQ Is Going to Respond to Biden’s...
OPINION

Both sides claim victory in court's FCC decision

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
WASHINGTON (BP) -- In a narrow decision that did not address the major constitutional questions, the U.S. Supreme Court Thursday tossed out the FCC's penalties against ABC and Fox for broadcasts that included expletives and brief nudity, saying the two networks were not given fair notice that "brief" moments of indecency could be fined under federal policy.
Advertisement

Significantly, though, the high court left open the door for the FCC to tweak its policy to appease the justices' concerns.

The 8-0 decision allowed both sides to claim victory.

At issue were broadcasts on Fox from 2002 and 2003 in which the "f-word" and "s-word" were said on live television, and a scripted ABC broadcast from 2003 that included partial female nudity.

The FCC found that both broadcasts violated the commission's indecency policy, and the broadcasters responded by filing suit, arguing they were not given fair notice and that the policy was unconstitutionally vague. For instance, the broadcasters argued, networks in the past have not been fined for airing "Schindler's List," despite its scenes depicting wartime nudity.

The FCC agreed with the broadcasters, but it did not toss out the policy, as ABC and Fox had requested. Instead, it found that the indecency policy was unconstitutional "as applied."

"The Commission failed to give Fox or ABC fair notice prior to the broadcasts in question that fleeting expletives and momentary nudity could be found actionably indecent," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the court's opinion. "Therefore, the Commission's standards as applied to these broadcasts were vague, and the Commission's orders must be set aside."

Advertisement

A "fundamental principle in our legal system," Kennedy wrote, "is that laws" must give "fair notice of conduct that is forbidden or required."

In a key sentence that conservative groups highlighted, Kennedy added later, "This opinion leaves the Commission free to modify its current indecency policy in light of its determination of the public interest and applicable legal requirements." It also "leaves the courts free to review the current policy or any modified policy in light of its content and application."

Broadcasters had asked the Supreme Court not only to toss out the policy but also to reverse one of the court's own opinions, the 1978 FCC v. Pacifica opinion, which helped form the basis for giving the FCC the authority to protect the airwaves from indecency. Justices, though, did not address the Pacifica case.

Backers of the federal government's indecency policy have said the Supreme Court's failure to uphold the commission's authority would unleash a flood of graphic nudity and harsh profanity on broadcast television in prime time.

Tim Winter, president of the Parents Television Council -- which supports the FCC's policy -- applauded the ruling.

"Once again the Supreme Court has ruled against the networks in their years-long campaign to obliterate broadcast decency standards," Winter said in a statement. "The Court ... specifically acknowledged the FCC's ability to continue broadcast decency enforcement as part of its public interest obligation.

Advertisement

Winter added, "Broadcast decency rules have existed to protect children since the dawn of the broadcast medium. It is for their sake that there will still be decency rules and the TV networks will be required to abide by them."

The decision was 8-0 because Justice Sonia Sotomayor recused herself from the case. The case was FCC v. Fox Television Stations.

Michael Foust is associate editor of Baptist Press.

Copyright (c) 2012 Southern Baptist Convention, Baptist Press www.BPNews.net

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos