What Can We Read Into This Year's CPAC?
Eric Swalwell Got Pressed Hard on the DHS Shutdown by…CNN?
Want to Guess What NBC News Omitted in Their Headline About This Dem...
Something Is Very Odd About This Chicago Shooting That Claimed a High School...
TSA Agents Finally Got Paid Yesterday..and It Wasn't Just One Check
Nuke It, Thune
Here's Another Update on Operation Epic Fury From Secretary of War Hegseth
This Man Attacked Hospital Staff With HIV-Positive Blood. Guess How Long He Was...
It Happened Again — Pregnant North Carolina Woman Stabbed by Criminal With 'Extensive'...
MI Democratic Candidate Abdul El-Sayed Responds to Damning Leaked Audio by Attacking Presi...
Lessons From the Vietnam War for Iran
Did You Hear the One…?
No American Left Behind Means No Exceptions
Sanctuary Cities Aren't 'Compassion' – They're Criminal Protection Rackets
Holy Week and the Power to Shape Perception by Manipulation and Fear
Capitol Voices

Mueller's Press Conference Was a Travesty

Mueller's Press Conference Was a Travesty
AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster

Was there ever a more useless press conference than that convened yesterday by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller? Words that came to mind as I watched the travesty were: unnecessary, irresponsible, and perhaps calculating.

Advertisement

The first words out of Mueller’s mouth indicated that he had nothing to say that hadn’t already been said in his 400-plus page report. Well, then why did he organize a press conference? If everything he had to say had already been said, then there was absolutely no reason for him to jump in front of the media. If he had a presser, he should have merely stated: “I have absolutely nothing to say except what was in my report. Thanks for coming.”

If he was being honest, and if he really didn’t have anything new to say, then his press conference was utterly unnecessary.

But Mueller continued, telling us what he claimed was already in his report. He took particular pains, though, to incite and reignite the flames of impeachment by explaining that IF he and his team of partisan lawyers had found President Trump innocent of obstructing justice, the report would have specifically said just that.

What a performance! Mueller, in an easy turn of phrase, flipped the entire constitutional scheme on its head. The President would have to, in Mueller’s world, prove his innocence. (And in Mueller’s world, President Trump could never prove his innocence.)

Advertisement

At best, Mueller’s superfluous and gratuitous press conference was irresponsible, but it appears to have been calculated to jump-start impeachment proceedings. He overtly indicated that his handpicked team of partisan attorneys had found misdeeds on the part of President Trump, but he couldn’t proceed to indict under Department of Justice guidelines.

Since Mueller knew that there was no collusion within a couple of months of initiating his investigation, as evidenced by the lapsing of FISA warrants, then why did he continue to investigate President Trump?

The most damning evidence Mueller’s team found was that President Trump allegedly directed his counsel, in frustration, to fire Mueller. But, even Don McGahn, the former White House counsel, didn’t take the president seriously. And while this directive was purported to take place, presidential and campaign staffers were made available for interviews, and the White House turned over millions of pages of documents. Not really damning at all…unless you are basing your investigation on partisan and ‘gotcha’ politics.

In short, this investigation was started illegitimately when former FBI Director James Comey leaked information to a friend in order to manipulate the appointment of Robert Mueller. Mueller persisted in the investigation even after he and his team apparently knew there was no Trump conspiracy with the Russians. Mueller allowed the cloud to hang over the president throughout the midterm elections. And, having released a report that exonerated the president on the collusion claims, Robert Mueller asserted that the president had to prove his innocence on obstruction allegations. Obstruction of what? An illegitimate investigation – with no underlying crime? Then the circle starts again.

Advertisement

The Mueller statement seems more than just reckless; it seems designed to power up the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment crusade. And that makes Mueller calculating. If Mueller really meant that he had nothing to say but what is contained in his report, he didn’t need to have a press conference – or even issue a statement. If he merely intended to redirect public attention to his report as his final word, he could have issued a press release saying so. But instead, he pressed on, pointing to the need for Congress to act. And, for my Democrat friends, the preferred action is removal of the 45th president of the United States. Until then they will settle for the embarrassing scene and headlines of impeachment.

Did Mr. Mueller appreciate how the pro-impeachment cadre of Dems would respond to his public statement? I undoubtedly believe so. Robert Mueller is a bright individual who has been involved in the Washington scene for decades. He had to have known where his intemperate comments would lead.

Democrats are no longer satisfied with undermining the president and his agenda; they want to achieve their coveted goal of impeaching President Trump. Remember, some Democrats were talking impeachment the day after the president was elected in 2016.

Advertisement

Mr. Mueller’s press conference and statement was unnecessary and reckless. More than that, though, his performance was calculated to stimulate impeachment of the president.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement