A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
USAID You Want a Revolution?
Roy Cooper Dodges Tough Questions About His Deadly Soft-on-Crime Policies
Colorado Democrats Want to Trample First, Second Amendments With Latest Bill
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
White House Religious Liberty Commission Member Removed After Hijacking Antisemitism Heari...
Federal Judge Blocks Pete Hegseth From Reducing Sen. Mark Kelly's Pay Over 'Seditious...
AG Pam Bondi Vows to Prosecute Threats Against Lawmakers, Even Across Party Lines
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fights Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Georgia Man Sentenced to Over 3 Years in Prison for TikTok Threats to...
Walz Administration Claims $217M in Fraud After Prosecutor Pointed to Billions
2 Pakistani Nationals Charged in $10M Medicare Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Feminists Battle Transgenders in U.K. vs U.N. Brouhaha

Feminists Battle Transgenders in U.K. vs U.N. Brouhaha

There is a kerfuffle in the United Kingdom that pits feminists against trans-people, and it all deals with whether or not the United Nations is being inclusive enough by labeling mothers as “pregnant women.” 

Advertisement

Recently, Britain proposed amendments to the United Nation’s International Covenant on Civil and Political rights that would change the clause that says “pregnant women” should be protected to “pregnant people” should be protected.  The British government fears that not changing the term to an all inclusive one will “exclude transgender people who have given birth.” In other words, it will neglect to protect women who identify as men that are pregnant. 

But feminists argue that this move is simply the transgender movement extending and embracing the patriarchal society and further removing women from the conversation.

Leading feminist writer  Sarah Ditum heavily criticized the move, “This isn’t inclusion. This is making women unmentionable. Having a female body and knowing what that means for reproduction doesn’t make you ‘exclusionary’. Forcing us to decorously scrub out any reference to our sex on pain of being called bigots is an insult.”

This actually highlights a growing problem on the left between feminists and transgender activists. Feminists take offense to the transgender’s movement desire to remove all gender form the public sphere because it, well, removes women from the public sphere as well.

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSGENDER WOMEN

Earlier this year, a fight actually broke out at a skirmish between feminist leaders and transgenders leaders. Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists (TERFs) is a British group that believes trans-women are not actually women and therefor should not be given the same legal protections as actual women. At a rally, that group got in a fist fight with trans-activists who opposed their mission.

But the desire by the British to change the U.N. Treaty seems rather silly, there have been only two known cases in the United Kingdom where children are born to women who transitioned to men but kept their reproductive organs.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement