It's No Secret Why Some Dems Are Pushing for Their Convention to Be...
Biden Threatened to 'Rethink' US Support for Israel, But Tried to Keep Those...
Here's What Happened When Pro-Hamas Activists Tried to Block Traffic in FL
Progressives are Mentally Defective
Electoral College Mischief Not Unprecedented—You Don’t Have to Look That Far Back
Maternal Mortality and the Failure to Value Motherhood
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 217: Celebrating Mother’s Day With the Mother of...
Democrat Believes Joe Biden’s Israel Threat Took Unnecessary 'Pressure off of Hamas'
Trump Flies Potential VP Pick to Massive 80,000 Person Rally
Is the Private Sector Ready For the Rising Threat of AI Cyber Warfare?
Why Are Jews and Christians Coming Together to Pray for Israel
Veterans Affairs OIG Calls for Full Investigation into $10.8 Million in Improper Incentive...
Illegal Aliens May Decide the Outcomes of National Elections, Without Even Voting
Donald Trump Weighs in on Those Rumors About Nikki Haley
NYC Sued for Denying IVF Coverage to Gay Male Couples
Tipsheet

Arizona Federal Judge Rules Voters Must Prove Their U.S. Citizenship Status In Order to Vote In Elections

An Arizona federal judge is upholding a state law that requires voters to provide verification of their U.S. citizenship before their votes can be counted. 

Advertisement

Following a lawsuit that led to Arizona legislators facing accusations of discrimination for requiring voters to verify their U.S. citizenship, Judge Susan Bolton ruled on Thursday that such requirements were not discriminatory. 

In March 2022, a group of plaintiffs led by the Hispanic voting rights organization “Mi Familia Vota” filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, claiming that the state’s law was unconstitutional. 

The Biden Administration filed a separate complaint that was consolidated in the case. 

The plaintiffs argued that H.B. 2492 was a “baseless assault on Arizona’s election system based on a conspiracy theory that non-citizens are voting, despite a persistent lack of credible evidence to support such claim.” They added that it was “cynical” and of “bad faith” to use the “politically motivated and false allegations” to restrict people from voting in U.S. elections. 

However, Bolton argued that Arizona has an interest in preventing voter fraud as the 2024 presidential election nears. 

“Plaintiffs have not carried their burden to show that the Voting Laws’ remaining citizenship investigation procedures, [documentary proof of citizenship] requirements, and registration cancellation procedures violate the [National Voter Registration Act] or the [Voting Rights Act],” Bolton wrote in her ruling. “Nor do these provisions impose an undue burden on the right to vote or violate the equal protection and due process guarantees of the U.S. Constitution. Finally, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs failed to show that the Voting Laws were enacted with any discriminatory purpose.” 

“Considering the evidence as a whole, the court concludes that Arizona’s interests in preventing non-citizens from voting and promoting public confidence in Arizona’s elections outweigh the limited burden voters might encounter when required to provide (documentary proof of citizenship),” her ruling continued.

Advertisement

With millions of illegal migrants entering the U.S. through President Joe Biden’s open southern border and Arizona being considered a crucial battleground state in the presidential election, Bolton’s ruling is one step closer to putting a stop to the Left’s radical policies. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement