It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Tipsheet

Pass The Advil: It’s Way Too Early To Talk About 2020, Even With Trump Beating Warren

Pass The Advil: It’s Way Too Early To Talk About 2020, Even With Trump Beating Warren

Stop. Just stop. I know polls are a gauge on the electorate. It directs the allocation of resources from political operations. It tests if campaign narratives are resonating, but enough with the 2020 speculations—even if they have President Trump beating the insufferable Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) (via The Hill):

Advertisement
President Trump would beat Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in a hypothetical 2020 election, though he would lose in a race against an unnamed Democrat, according to a Politico/Morning Consult poll released Wednesday.

When asked to choose between Trump or Warren, 42 percent said they would vote for Trump, while 36 percent chose Warren. Twenty-two percent said they did not know or did not have an opinion.

When asked if they would vote for Trump or the unnamed Democrat, 35 percent said they would probably vote for Trump, while 43 percent said they would probably pick the Democrat. Twenty-three percent said they did not know or have an opinion.

[…]

The poll was conducted on Feb. 9 and 10, surveying 1,791 registered voters. It has a margin of error of 2 percentage points.

We’re less than 40 days into Trump’s presidency. This is the very definition of premature. I know some folks are upset Trump won and Clinton lost. And you’re just wishing we could flash-forward to 2020. You can’t.

Granted, now that this poll is out there, it’s quite interesting that not even Warren, who is trying to become the new leader of the Democratic Party, loses to a man whom the Left universally hates. It puts more stock in the poll about Warren’s re-election chances, which are quite weak for a deep blue state; 44 percent of Massachusetts voters want her re-elected, 46 percent want someone else to have a shot. Yikes.

Advertisement

Yet, that’s three years away. Anything can happen. Trump could rise above the current hiccup with Michael Flynn, get something done on infrastructure, come up with something unique on health care, deliver on trade promises, usher in months of job creation, and possibly get movement on tax reform. Maybe he has a childcare program that’s well liked, or everything could come crashing down. The point is 2020 is way off. Pollsters, liberals, Clintonites—stop trying to make this a thing. It’s not. Three years is more like three million in politics. Plenty of time to succeed or fail—and we should all hope that Trump does succeed. At the same time, it’s refreshing to see the Democrats’ liberal stalwart—Warren—crash and burn even with this outrageously early poll about the next presidential election. 

Oh, and concerning Millennials, they broke for Trump over Warren 39/37.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement