Here's What's Missing in That 2024 DNC Autopsy...and It's a Glaring Omission
Ken Dilanian's Conflict With FBI Stats; CNN Is Struck by Its Non-Reporting on...
Racing Champion Kyle Busch Dead at 41
After Killing Late Night Television, Stephen Colbert Signs Off
Is AI The Answer to 'Fixing' NICS Gun Background Check System?
Jeff Bezos Reveals the Truth About Wealthy Businesses That the Left Never Will
This Republican Senate Candidate Says He Might Have to Consider 'Both Sides' of...
The UN's Climate Doomsday Scenario Just Fell Apart
Do You Want a Free $620 a Month? Just Become a Homeless Person...
Pennsylvania Man Who Never Visited Alaska Tried to Steal Alaskans' Dividend Checks
Two Florida Men Charged in $1.25M Bribery Scheme to Win Army Contracts in...
Chicago Man Indicted in Alleged SUV Attack on ICE Agent During Operation Midway...
Maine U.S. Senate Candidate Runs From Question About Alleged Porta-Potty Fetish
Maryland Man Sentenced to 6 Years in $3.5 Million COVID-19 Unemployment Fraud Scheme
Trio Sentenced in $10.7M Bingo Scam Targeting Funds for Sick Children
Tipsheet

Surprise! D.C. Lawyers Want To Reinstate Carrying Ban

Surprise! D.C. Lawyers Want To Reinstate Carrying Ban

For a brief time, concealed carry permit holders could exercise their Second Amendment rights by bringing their firearms into Washington D.C.; a right that was previously denied until the Palmer decision. Granted, if you were a D.C. resident, you had to have the gun registered. For outsiders, you couldn’t open carry your rifles or shotguns, and your handgun couldn’t have a magazine with more than ten-rounds.

Advertisement

Until recently, the District of Columbia was the last place where citizens were banned from carrying their firearms outside of their homes. A stay, which was agreed upon by both parties in the Palmer case, was issued to allow the city council to draft legislation in response to the ruling. But D.C. lawyers are trying to get the carrying ban reinstated (via Washington Free Beacon):

D.C. lawyers cited the District’s “unique character” as justification for the handgun ban.

“The District, in addition to being the seat of the federal government and home to the President, is host to thousands of foreign dignitaries each year and the site of many mass demonstrations,” the city argues. “The potential for armed mischief is thus perhaps greater in the District of Columbia than in any other American city.”

The city also argues the ban does not impede the Second Amendment right to bear arms.

“The Court should find that the District’s prohibition on the public carrying of firearms is constitutional, in that ‘it does not seriously impact a person’s ability to defend himself in the home, the Second Amendment’s core protection,” the city argues. “It does not ban the quintessential weapon—the handgun—used for self-defense in the home. Nor does it prevent an individual from keeping a suitable weapon for protection in the home.”

[U.S. District Judge Frederick] Scullin declared D.C.’s blanket ban on carrying guns in public to be unconstitutional in July and gave city officials until Oct. 22 to craft new regulations in line with his ruling. D.C. has also appealed that deadline and asked for more time.

Advertisement

Bring it on, D.C.  

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement