New Emails Show the Biden White House Coordinated Directly With the DOJ to...
DNC Reveals Why They're Keeping Their 2024 Autopsy Under Seal. Get Ready to...
How 'John' the Homeless Guy Solved the Brown University Shooting
How You Know the Lib Media Realizes There's Nothing in the Epstein Files...
The View Co-Host Drops Embarrassingly Shameful Take on Trump's Bonuses to Our Troops
Trump Knew What He Was Doing With This Move on the Kennedy Center
Trump Just Made a Move That Would Make JFK Proud
Ruben Gallego Doesn’t Want to Stop the Drug Trade, and Says Trump Is...
As America Turns 250, Here's How One Content Creator Is Making Patriotism Shareable...
Guess Who Rachel Maddow Blames for Undoing 30 Years of HIV/AIDS Prevention Work
Markwayne Mullin Just Nuked Bernie Sanders for Refusing to Help Kids With Cancer
Buyer's Remorse? Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich Blasts State for Healthcare Worker Abortion...
Jimmy Kimmel’s Year From Hell (According to Jimmy Kimmel)
Zohran Mamdani Appointee Resigns After Antisemitic Social Media Posts Resurface
You Won't Believe What the Australian PM's Solution to the Bondi Beach Terror...
Tipsheet

Surprise! D.C. Lawyers Want To Reinstate Carrying Ban

For a brief time, concealed carry permit holders could exercise their Second Amendment rights by bringing their firearms into Washington D.C.; a right that was previously denied until the Palmer decision. Granted, if you were a D.C. resident, you had to have the gun registered. For outsiders, you couldn’t open carry your rifles or shotguns, and your handgun couldn’t have a magazine with more than ten-rounds.

Advertisement

Until recently, the District of Columbia was the last place where citizens were banned from carrying their firearms outside of their homes. A stay, which was agreed upon by both parties in the Palmer case, was issued to allow the city council to draft legislation in response to the ruling. But D.C. lawyers are trying to get the carrying ban reinstated (via Washington Free Beacon):

D.C. lawyers cited the District’s “unique character” as justification for the handgun ban.

“The District, in addition to being the seat of the federal government and home to the President, is host to thousands of foreign dignitaries each year and the site of many mass demonstrations,” the city argues. “The potential for armed mischief is thus perhaps greater in the District of Columbia than in any other American city.”

The city also argues the ban does not impede the Second Amendment right to bear arms.

“The Court should find that the District’s prohibition on the public carrying of firearms is constitutional, in that ‘it does not seriously impact a person’s ability to defend himself in the home, the Second Amendment’s core protection,” the city argues. “It does not ban the quintessential weapon—the handgun—used for self-defense in the home. Nor does it prevent an individual from keeping a suitable weapon for protection in the home.”

[U.S. District Judge Frederick] Scullin declared D.C.’s blanket ban on carrying guns in public to be unconstitutional in July and gave city officials until Oct. 22 to craft new regulations in line with his ruling. D.C. has also appealed that deadline and asked for more time.

Advertisement

Bring it on, D.C.  

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement