It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fights Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Tipsheet

Winner of Worst Week In Washington: Hillary Clinton

Winner of Worst Week In Washington: Hillary Clinton

So, who had the worst week in Washington? Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post said that’ll be former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, whose book sales are sinking faster than the Titanic (via WaPo):

Advertisement

Then there is the question of just how well Clinton’s book is actually selling. According to Nielsen BookScan, sales of “Hard Choices” this past week dropped by 46 percent from the week prior, which was down 44 percent from the week before that. Seeking to squash the book-isn’t-selling story, Correct the Record, a pro-Clinton outside group, released a memo Wednesday night noting that the book was No. 1 on the New York Times bestseller list for the third straight week and blaming the “right wing” for pushing out false information.

Actually, maybe the book tour is a perfect encapsulation of what a Clinton campaign might look like. And for that, Hillary Clinton, you had the worst week in Washington. Congrats, or something.

Cillizza did touch upon the exorbitant speaking fees the former First Lady has been receiving, like the $225,000 she’ll earn when she speaks at the University of Nevada in Las Vegas later this year. But, T. Becket Adams at the Washington Examiner wrote that Mrs. Clinton would be banking an average of $1.8 million for eight speeches over the course of this year.

For example, the University of Connecticut, which recently increased its tuition by 6.5 percent, paid Clinton $251,250 from a donor fund to speak in April, the Post reported.

Meanwhile, the University of California at Los Angeles paid Clinton roughly $300,000 to speak in March, and she is scheduled to deliver a speech in October at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas, where tuition will jump by 17 percent over the next for years, at a cost to the school of about $225,000.

She has also delivered paid speeches at the University at Buffalo, Colgate University, Hamilton College in New York, Simmons College in Boston and the University of Miami in Florida.

Advertisement

Of course, Clinton could’ve avoided having the magnifying glass placed upon her wealth if she’d had more finesse detailing life after the White House, where she infamously claimed she and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, we’re “dead broke.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement