Bill Maher Delivers One of the Most Devastating Attacks Against the Left Yet
The Three Issues That Allowed Trump to Break Through the Liberal Urban Wall
Dems to Pelosi: Sit Down and Shut Up
How DOJ Staffers Reacted to Matt Gaetz's Nomination as Attorney General
Gavin Newsom Urged To Use State Law Enforcement on Gun Controlled Mass Transit
Colorado Governor Faces Backlash From Dems Over Post About RFK Jr.
We Need to Stop This From Happening to Our Children
Trump Is Suing the Mainstream Media-- and They Ought to Be Afraid
There Was One Topic That Was Off Limits in Kamala Harris' Interview With...
Oprah's Hometown Newspaper Calls Her Out for Accepting $1 Million From Harris Campaign
John Fetterman Says What We're All Thinking
Third-Party-Payers Might Be the Real Financial Catastrophe
Will President-elect Trump Deliver on His 11-Point Education Plan?
A Whistleblower's Warning: RFK Jr. Must Address the Missing Migrant Children Crisis at...
Democrats Defend Soviet-Era ‘Myth of Infallibility’
Tipsheet

UN Expert Tells Facebook Their Definition of Terrorism Is 'Overly Broad'

United Nations Human Rights expert Fionnuala Ní Aoláin wrote a letter to Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg Monday to express concern over the social media giant’s “overly broad” definition of terrorism which, she believes, could be harmful to free speech.

Advertisement

She notes that, in a blog post, Facebook defines terrorist organizations as “any non-governmental organization that engages in premeditated acts of violence against persons or property to intimidate a civilian population, government, or international organization in order to achieve a political, religious, or ideological aim.”

Ní Aoláin explains that “the definition employed by Facebook equates all non-state groups that use violence in pursuit of any goals or ends to terrorist entities. However…only a subset of violent acts committed by a non-state actor can be qualified as terrorism.”

She goes on to explain that Facebook’s overly broad definition could aid governments seeking to silence dissent, violent or otherwise.

“The use of such a sweeping definition is particularly worrying in light of a number of governments seeking to stigmatize diverse forms of dissent and opposition (whether peaceful or violent) as terrorism,” she writes. “The definition is further at odds with international humanitarian law as it qualifies all non-state armed groups party to a non-international armed conflict as terrorists, even if these groups comply with international humanitarian law.”

She went on to voice concern over a lack of transparency about the manner in which Facebook determines if a person belongs to a particular group, and how that person has “the opportunity to meaningfully challenge such determination.”

“The absence of any independent processes of review, oversight and monitoring of Facebook’s actions is also highly problematic,” she emphasized.

Advertisement

Reuters notes that social media groups have been under scrutiny from the UN recently over the targeting of minorities.

Former UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein said last week that Facebook had “allowed its platform to be used to incite violence against the Rohingya Muslim minority in Myanmar, where UN experts say a military crackdown had ‘genocidal intent.’”

Facebook spokeswoman Ruchika Budhraja told Just Security that Facebook aims to help the public “better understand our thinking and the frameworks we use to make decisions” about the site's content and users. Facebook executives met with Ní Aoláin last week.

“By transparently sharing our definition of terrorism, our goal is to create opportunities for increased dialogue with important stakeholders, as was the case here,” Budhraja said in an email to Just Security. “We welcome this dialogue and hope to continue our conversations with the Special Rapporteur and others who are thinking deeply and working tirelessly on these issues.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement