No Circular Firing Squads This Time, Republicans
The Relevancy of Drudge Is Over
Joy to the World
Pete Hegseth Is the Best Choice to Reform the Pentagon
Conservatives Disagree On Yellowstone’s ‘Woke’ Ending
To Reform Congress, Enact Term Limits
How the Left VIciously Creates Fake White Male Guilt
Israel Is Not Interested In Victory With Gaza
The Expanding Culture Of Death And How To Stop It
Report: Biden's Nap Delayed Meeting With Gold Star Families Following Chaotic Afghanistan...
Scranton Officials Demand for Biden’s Name to Be Removed from Landmark
Why Hasn’t NASA Told Us About This?
Biden Staffers Pressure President to Dole Out Millions to Defund the Police
What's Next for Lara Trump?
Biden Admin Funded $4 Million Program to Pull Kids Out of School and...
Tipsheet

Abortion Groups Protest Kavanaugh, Launch Ad Campaign Targeting Vulnerable Republicans

The abortion advocacy group NARAL, along with Planned Parenthood and others, is claiming that President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, could overturn Roe v. Wade.

Advertisement

NARAL launched an ad campaign Monday evening targeting five states to fight Kavanaugh’s nomination. The group attempts to frame him as “a vote to end Roe v. Wade, criminalize abortion, and punish women.”

“We need senators who understand it isn’t their place to play judge and jury on women,” NARAL says in their announcement. “The message is clear: every senator must stand unequivocally for our fundamental freedoms, or they will pay the price in November.”

The ads will run in Texas, Alaska, Maine, Colorado and Nevada. The group is specifically targeting vulnerable Senate Republicans including Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, and Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada.

Last week, NARAL and Planned Parenthood called on the Senate to demand a new “personal liberty standard” of forcing Supreme Court nominees to affirm the Roe v. Wade decision. Sen. Schumer agreed with the abortion groups’ standard Monday, arguing that nominees simply saying they would respect Roe as precedent was no longer enough.

Advertisement

Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL, said that this "personal liberty" standard was necessary and any of President Trump’s list of Supreme Court picks would “decimate our rights as enshrined under Roe.”

While declining to give his personal views on the matter, Kavanaugh has already said when he was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit in 2006 that he would “follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully. That would be binding precedent of the court. It has been decided by the Supreme Court."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement