Republicans Are Slowly 'Learing' How to Fight the Democrats
CNN's Scott Jennings Shreds This Lib Guest's Points on ICE and Abrego Garcia...
Watch What Happens When Journalists Knock on the Door of a Somali-run Daycare...
CNN's Scott Jennings Exploded at Lib Guest...and It Was Totally Justified
Covenant School Shooter Used Federal Student Aid to Buy Weapons for Mass Shooting
New FBI Docs Might Have Revealed a Motive for the Nashville Shooter
CNN Panelists Melt Down After Scott Jennings Uses The Left’s Favorite Show Against...
WI Governor Tony Evers Said 2025 Was the 'Year of the Kid.' Here's...
'Systemic Fraud:' HUD Secretary Turner Says Questionable Rent Assistance Payments Weren't...
Exclusive: Alaska AG Stephen Cox Presses Alaska Airlines on Policies That May Hinder...
Here's How Many Starbucks Stores Closed in 2025
Nick Shirley Showed Us What Journalism Looks Like. Now CNN Is Attacking His...
Did Alpha News Reporters Find Even More Fraud at Somali Autism Centers?
Colombia's President Says US Attack on Venezuela Targeted Commie Narco-Terrorists
Border Patrol Head Greg Bovino Shuts Down 'Clown' Democrat Politician for Choosing Illegal...
Tipsheet

JFK's Legacy: Proving the Laffer Curve

While the mainstream media's hagiography of John F. Kennedy continues on the 50th anniversary of his tragic death, it's important to remember his full legacy - not just the parts that the mainstream media likes to promote.
Advertisement

President Kennedy proved the existence of the Laffer curve. When he came into office, Americans at the top end of the income ladder faced marginal tax rates in excess of 90%. Kennedy proposed tax cuts across the board - including marginal income tax rates, corporate rates, capital gains rates. And after JFK's tax cuts passed, tax revenue increased. As Diana Furchtgott-Roth, director of Economics21, writes:

Kennedy was one of the first presidents to articulate a supply-side theory. On Nov. 20, 1962, at a news conference, he said “It is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now ... Cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit, but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy which can bring a budget surplus.”

Kennedy’s tax cuts were not passed by Congress until after his death on Feb. 26, 1964, in the Revenue Act of 1964. The bill reduced the top marginal rate from over 90% to 70%. Tax revenues increased from $94 billion in 1961 to $153 billion in 1968, and the new rates led to a greater percentage of tax revenue coming from those making over $50,000 a year. Tax receipts from those making over $50,000 rose 57%, whereas receipts from those making under $50,000 rose 11%.

It's important to remember that the Laffer curve doesn't mean that cuts in tax rates always lead to higher tax revenue. It means that there's a breaking point at which the disincentives for labor are so strong that fewer people are working, contributing to the economy and reporting taxable income. 90% rates are clearly above that. It might not be the case that our current 39.5% top rate is above the peak on the Laffer curve. (That also doesn't mean that marginal rate cuts at the highest levels aren't a good idea - they might be if they make up for the revenue loss in long-term economic growth.)

Advertisement

John F. Kennedy's presidency was an important one in many ways. The mainstream media typically celebrates his anti-communism and civil rights policies. But if we're going to celebrate President Kennedy, we should remember all of the good things he did, not just the ones the media wants us to remember.

None of this means that JFK was a "conservative," though. And for an important counterpoint on the MSM legacy of JFK, Dylan Matthews of the Washington Post argues that his presidency really wasn't all that great.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos