America's Largest Muslim Advocacy Group is Very Upset Their Pro-Hamas Encampment is Gone
Time to Go: Police Begin Dismantling Pro-Hamas Camp at George Washington University
It's Not Columbia University, But It Doesn't Negate the Error These Pro-Hamas Clowns...
Excuse Me, Gov. Hochul, You Can't Really Say That About Black Kids
'Unlawful': Gov. Abbott Tells Texas Schools to Ignore Biden's Title IX Rewrite
Panama's President-Elect Vows to Close Key Migration Routes to US
COVID Subcommittee Asks Blinken to Declassify Docs That 'Credibly Suggest' Where COVID Ori...
Ilhan Omar Hit With Censure Resolution
'Incubator of Bigotry': Group of Federal Judges Tells Columbia They Won't Hire Any...
Vulnerable Dem Incumbent Sherrod Brown: Biden's Politics 'Not Much Different From Mine'
Here’s Why One Pharmaceutical Company Will Withdraw Its COVID-19 Vaccine
Emory's Jewish Problem
Georgia Court of Appeals Just Delivered Some Bad News for Fani Willis
New Poll Shows Biden in Trouble With Older Voters in Key Swing State
Why Is the Judge in Trump's New York Trial Muzzling a Key Defense...
Tipsheet

Stop Worrying and Learn to Love the Gov(ernment)

There's an important and provocative interview and essay out over at Reason's blog by William D. Eggers and John O'Leary, "Five Reasons Why Libertarians Shouldn't Hate Government
Advertisement
." Though directed at libertarians (it's Reason, obviously) it should be taken as a message to all small-government types, conservatives, libertarians, tea partiers, whoever.

Many conservatives and libertarians come from the world of business. They don’t particularly like government. They view it as merely a necessary evil. As a consequence, they rarely immerse themselves in the intricacies of governing, preferring to make their case from a safe distance.

Once in power, they tend to have far more difficulty navigating the complex terrain of the public sector. The result? From Ronald Reagan’s Grace Commission to the 1995 government shutdown by a GOP Congress, most high-profile attempts to shrink government fail.

Until small-government types better master the nuts and bolts of the public sector—how to design policies that work in the real world and how to execute on large public undertakings—their initiatives to downsize government will continue to disappoint.

[# More #] As they note, mindless deregulation and spending cuts are not useful and may be actively harmful to the limited-government cause. They offer examples of limited government reforms that worked (such as airline deregulation) and those that failed (certain deregulation of utilities).
Advertisement

The authors also emphasize that, to win the argument, it's important to also note the successes of big government. They're right; on occasion, big government has worked, as they note, in the Marshall Plan and the Apollo space program, among other endeavors. But it is the work of limited-government advocates to note that this is for one of a few reasons. The government undertaking could justifiably be within the sphere of what constitutes a legitimate function of government, or it could be an anomaly, a unique cresting of personality, time and place, and that these anomalies are the exception, not the rule, to big-government enterprises. It may be for other reasons.

The questions and assertions made by the authors are fascinating and controversial; what do you think about their advice that small-government advocates stop worrying and learn to love the gov? What other reasons are there that a big-government program would succeed?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement