This Reporter Suffered a Total Meltdown Over a Top VA Dem Having Her...
Sam Stein Is Bothered by the Louise Lucas Raid But Unbothered by the...
Rampant Antisemitism Is a Feature, Not a Bug, of Mamdani's Administration
Dem House Hopeful Attacks Iowans After Backlash to Muslim Prayer Controversy in State...
What Makes an American, American? Justice Gorsuch Reminds Us of the Answer
Steve Hilton Confronts Xavier Becerra Over Campaign Fund Scandal As Staffers Face Prison...
Medicaid Millionaires Are Hiding in Plain Sight
U.S. Secret Service Seized 5 Skimming Devices, Stopped $5.2M in Fraud in Northern...
DOJ Launches Blitz on LA's Open-Air Drug Market, Seizes 40 Pounds of Fentanyl
'The Constitution Is Not a Suggestion': DOJ Takes Aim at Denver's Assault Rifle...
DOJ Probes Virginia Prosecutor Who Allegedly Let Illegal Alien Walk Before Deadly Stabbing
Miami Beach Man Faces Federal Charges Over Social Media Threats to Assassinate Trump,...
Roy Cooper's Immigration Detainer Veto Comes Back to Haunt His Senate Bid
Florida Arrest Exposes $2.8M Food Aid Scam Built on Stolen Grocery Store Identities
Two Men Sentenced in $522 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme Involving Genetic Tests
Tipsheet

BREAKING: Judge Refuses to Dismiss Case Challenging Obamacare Subsidies

BREAKING: Judge Refuses to Dismiss Case Challenging Obamacare Subsidies

UPDATE: The judge will not issue an injunction to stop the IRS from issuing subsidies, meaning Obamacare can move forward as planned. However, the lawsuit will also move forward and depending on the outcome, could limit IRS power to issue Obamacare subsidies.

Advertisement

A federal judge has refused to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the legality of Obamacare subsidies distributed by the IRS to people enrolling in the new healthcare system. The Department of Justice has argued for months the lawsuit should be dismissed. More from the Wall Street Journal:

A federal judge on Tuesday refused to dismiss a lawsuit that seeks to block the Obama administration from offering subsidies to low- and middle-income individuals who buy health insurance though online exchanges run by the federal government.

U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman in Washington, in an oral ruling from the bench, rejected several Justice Department arguments on why the legal challenge should be tossed out of court.

The challengers, four individuals and three employers, argue that the insurance subsidies are barred by the actual language in President Barack Obama’s signature health-care law, the Affordable Care Act.

Under the act, individuals can qualify for subsidies, in the form of tax credits, if they buy health insurance through an exchange “established by the state.” A majority of states, however, chose not to set up their own marketplaces, leaving the federal government to run some or all of the exchanges in 36 states.

The challengers contend that the health law precludes subsidies for consumers who buy insurance through those federally run exchanges instead of state exchanges. They say the Internal Revenue Service contravened the text of the law when it promulgated a regulation last year making clear that the subsidies were available to individuals who bought insurance on either type of exchange.
Advertisement

The judge is expected to rule this afternoon on whether the subsidies must be delayed until the court comes to a solution and final ruling. If an injunction in the law is issued, delaying subsidies, the Obama administration would receive another big blow to the roll out of Obamacare.

Last week as part of the government shutdown and debt ceiling deal, lawmakers passed a requirement for Obamacare applicants to provide income verification before receiving subsidies in order to make sure those who do not qualify don't receive them. Subsidies were originally created for people who do not qualify for coverage through Medicaid, Medicare or their employer.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos