Of Course, Sean Penn Is Making a Movie About This Event. The Left...
*THAT* Is Not a Good Sign for Dems Regarding the 2026 Midterms
This Is Why Trump's Labor Secretary Is Threatening to Withholding Unemployment Funds to...
John Thune Is in the Hot Seat Over SAVE America Act
Trump Lays Down the Law: No FISA Extension Without SAVE America Act
Desperate California Anti-Gunners Target Gun Company
These People Are Nuts!
Brad Thor’s 'Choke Point' Proves Scot Harvath Is Still the Gold Standard of...
President Trump Says Military Action Against Iran Is Still on the Table
CNN Allegedly Obtained a Copy of the Iran Deal. There's Just One Problem.
JD Vance Levels Jessica Tarlov for Repeating Iranian Propaganda
Rep. Nellie Pou Cares More About Illegal Aliens Than American Citizens
Here's Why the Iran Deal Has Yet to Be Released to the Public
Bombshell UK Report Exposes Sinister Sexual Abuse and Torture of 250,000 Girls by...
Mamdani 2.0? DSA-Backed Democrat Leads Race As Trump Floats Total Takeover
Tipsheet

BREAKING: Judge Refuses to Dismiss Case Challenging Obamacare Subsidies

BREAKING: Judge Refuses to Dismiss Case Challenging Obamacare Subsidies

UPDATE: The judge will not issue an injunction to stop the IRS from issuing subsidies, meaning Obamacare can move forward as planned. However, the lawsuit will also move forward and depending on the outcome, could limit IRS power to issue Obamacare subsidies.

Advertisement

A federal judge has refused to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the legality of Obamacare subsidies distributed by the IRS to people enrolling in the new healthcare system. The Department of Justice has argued for months the lawsuit should be dismissed. More from the Wall Street Journal:

A federal judge on Tuesday refused to dismiss a lawsuit that seeks to block the Obama administration from offering subsidies to low- and middle-income individuals who buy health insurance though online exchanges run by the federal government.

U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman in Washington, in an oral ruling from the bench, rejected several Justice Department arguments on why the legal challenge should be tossed out of court.

The challengers, four individuals and three employers, argue that the insurance subsidies are barred by the actual language in President Barack Obama’s signature health-care law, the Affordable Care Act.

Under the act, individuals can qualify for subsidies, in the form of tax credits, if they buy health insurance through an exchange “established by the state.” A majority of states, however, chose not to set up their own marketplaces, leaving the federal government to run some or all of the exchanges in 36 states.

The challengers contend that the health law precludes subsidies for consumers who buy insurance through those federally run exchanges instead of state exchanges. They say the Internal Revenue Service contravened the text of the law when it promulgated a regulation last year making clear that the subsidies were available to individuals who bought insurance on either type of exchange.
Advertisement

The judge is expected to rule this afternoon on whether the subsidies must be delayed until the court comes to a solution and final ruling. If an injunction in the law is issued, delaying subsidies, the Obama administration would receive another big blow to the roll out of Obamacare.

Last week as part of the government shutdown and debt ceiling deal, lawmakers passed a requirement for Obamacare applicants to provide income verification before receiving subsidies in order to make sure those who do not qualify don't receive them. Subsidies were originally created for people who do not qualify for coverage through Medicaid, Medicare or their employer.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement