J6 Obsessive Dismisses a Presidential Assassination Attempt; Maine's Platner Is Now a Demo...
Humans. Americans. Let Everyone Be Treated Equally.
Detransitioner Asks IBM Shareholders to Stop Funding Trans Surgeries for Minors
Future GOP Presidential Nominees Must Endure Severe Storms
What About Earth’s Threatened and Endangered People?
You Are on Your Own in America's Progressive Cities
Biden’s Ill-Advised Rule Against Critical Minerals Mining Is Finally Gone
Socialist Cognitive Dissonance: Our Revolution Endorses Billionaire Tom Steyer for Califor...
The Social Media Age Is Over, but America Can Still Lead on Tech
Has Iran’s Ceasefire Become a Green Light for Repression?
Desperate Families Here and Abroad Show They Need Government Support, Not Resistance
Fake Iranian Opposition – Wolves in Different Wolves' Clothes
Wait, the Biden Administration Did What to Christians?
Trump Says the U.S. Will Be Taking Over Cuba 'Almost Immediately'
Feds Seize $2M From Pasadena Wound Clinic Accused of Defrauding Medicare for Fake...
Tipsheet

BREAKING: Senate Commitee Passes Resolution Approving Military Action in Syria

BREAKING: Senate Commitee Passes Resolution Approving Military Action in Syria
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee has passed a resolution approving military force in Syria by a 10-7 vote. The resolution will now go to the full Senate for a vote next week. Republicans McCain, Corker and Flake voted for the resolution. Democratic Senator Ed Markey voted present.
Advertisement


The resolution states military action will not include boots on the ground and has a 90-day time frame.

UPDATE: John McCain said early Wednesday that he could not support the resolution, but ended up voting for it anyway. He also played poker on his iPhone yesterday during a hearing on Syria.

UPDATE II:
McCain voted yes after inserting an amendment into the resolution saying the goal of military action is to shift the momentum on the battlefield. Essentially, the amendment declares the United States has taken the side against the Assad regime in the Syrian civil war. This is opposite of President Obama's stance, which isn't regime change but very limited military strikes in order to "send a message."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement