Good Riddance to the Awful Thomas Massie
About that CIA Raid on Tulsi Gabbard's Office...
UK's Labour Party Got Brutalized in Recent Local Elections...and Many Want Keir Starmer...
Hakeem Jeffries Had a Total Meltdown Yesterday
There Could Be One Fewer Panican Republican in the Senate Soon
Anchorman Director on White Liberals: 'No Group Is Worse’
Former Staffer Says Congressman Made Her 'Uncomfortable' in Text Message Exchange
Senate Votes Down Iran War Powers Resolution, but Another Republican Has Defected
Graham Platner Called a Maine Police Chief 'Trash' Over BLM Stance
The New York Times Doubles Down, Defends Op-Ed That Made Horrific Accusations Against...
President Trump Celebrates Successful Meetings, Future Cooperation With China in State Din...
Here Are Some Details of President Trump's Meeting With China's Xi Jinping
Rep. Wesley Hunt Shuts Down Democrats' Shameful 'Jim Crow' Talk
'A Slap in the Face:' Guess Where Zohran Mamdani Made Cuts to NYC's...
AOC, Ice Cream, and Veggies
Tipsheet

Howard Dean Digs Scott Walker: "How Well-educated is This Guy?"

Howard Dean Digs Scott Walker: "How Well-educated is This Guy?"

As Jazz Shaw notes, educated enough to get elected three times in four years.

Yeah, this guy’s pretty dumb:

"This is a particular problem for Scott Walker which has not been an issue yet, but it will. Scott Walker, were he to become president, would be the first president in many generations who did not have a college degree. So the issue here is not just the issue of dancing around the question of evolution for political reasons, the issue is, how well educated is this guy?"

Advertisement

I share Scarborough’s indignation. This is a cheap and snide attempt to question Scott Walker’s intelligence and therefore his fitness to serve as president. Because he didn’t earn his Bachelor’s degree, we’re told, GOP primary voters should look to other candidates. This is absurd.

First, Dean knows full well some of the best U.S. presidents did not graduate from college. He says as much. Still, the point is worth reemphasizing: Lincoln -- whose birthday is today, as it happens -- did just fine without that prestigious qualification. Ditto Harry Truman. I'd rather vote for a candidate for president today, who has demonstrable leadership abilities and a strong record to run on, than an alumnus of Columbia University and Harvard Law School who had...neither of these things. Sorry.

Second, what a revealing argument. In Dean’s estimation, those who didn’t graduate college are “unknowledgeable.” Could his characterization be any more patronizing? For what it’s worth, I attended and graduated from college, but do I know more about advising presidents than Karl Rove or entrepreneurism than the late Steve Jobs? For that matter, do I know more about governing than Scott Walker? Hell no. The more one thinks about these things, the more one realizes how practically irrelevant a college degree can sometimes be. Scarborough's right.

Advertisement

Don’t get me wrong: a college degree is not nothing. It opens doors of opportunity. But lacking one should not be disqualifying for the presidency -- especially when the constitutional requirements for occupying that office say nothing about obtaining one.

Scott Walker's a smart guy. Those who suggest otherwise are dead wrong and should be called out.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement