It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Tipsheet

Rachel Maddow Accused of 'Anti-Semitic Rant' Against New Trump Nominee

Rachel Maddow Accused of 'Anti-Semitic Rant' Against New Trump Nominee
AP Photo/Steven Senne

With so much anti-Semitic rhetoric on the Democratic side of the aisle lately and among progressives in general, it's hard to keep up, but this opinion from MSNBC's Rachel Maddow warranted a response. Maddow took aim at Steve Menashi, Trump's newest nominee to the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a lengthy segment on her program Thursday night.

Advertisement

Menashi served as a law clerk to Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and to Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito. Before that, he earned his B.A., magna cum laude, from Dartmouth College, and his J.D., with distinction, from Stanford Law School.

Yet, it was a law review article to which he contributed for the University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law entitled "Ethnonationalism and Liberal Democracy" that gave Maddow pause about his nomination. In it, Menashi argued how a nation like Israel, dominated by one ethnicity, can be a successful democracy. Maddow interpreted the "blood curdling" document to mean the Jewish nominee was arguing that, "you can’t have a country that works if you’ve got all sorts of different people in it."

It is "a high-brow argument for racial purity," she maintained.

“It ends with a war cry,” Maddow explains, that suggests “democracy can’t work unless the county is defined by a unifying race.”

Conservative, Jewish, and legal groups did not like Maddow's interpretation of the paper, and are accusing her of going on an anti-Semitic rant. Judicial Crisis Network President Carrie Severino said the host should be "ashamed of herself," while others demanded she and the network apologize.

Advertisement

Related:

ANTI-SEMITISM

Congressional liberals like Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Ilhan Omar (D-MN) have also peddled anti-Semitism with their support of the BDS movement, which encourages the boycott of Israeli goods and services. It's for that reason they were recently banned from visiting the country.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement