Chris Cuomo Had a Former Leftist Call in to His Show. He Clearly...
This Town Filled Its Coffers With a Traffic Shakedown Scheme – Now They...
Planned Parenthood: Infants Not 'Conscious Beings' and Unlikely to Feel Pain
USAID You Want a Revolution?
Roy Cooper Dodges Tough Questions About His Deadly Soft-on-Crime Policies
Axios Is Back With Another Ridiculous Anti-Trump Headline
Colorado Democrats Want to Trample First, Second Amendments With Latest Bill
White House Religious Liberty Commission Member Removed After Hijacking Antisemitism Heari...
Federal Judge Blocks Pete Hegseth From Reducing Sen. Mark Kelly's Pay Over 'Seditious...
AG Pam Bondi Vows to Prosecute Threats Against Lawmakers, Even Across Party Lines
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fights Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Georgia Man Sentenced to Over 3 Years in Prison for TikTok Threats to...
Walz Administration Claims $217M in Fraud After Prosecutor Pointed to Billions
2 Pakistani Nationals Charged in $10M Medicare Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Catholic Jesuit Paper Rescinds its Kavanaugh Endorsement

Catholic Jesuit Paper Rescinds its Kavanaugh Endorsement

America: The Jesuit Review, a Catholic Jesuit magazine, didn't like what it heard during Thursday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. "It is time for the Kavanaugh nomination to be withdrawn," the editors wrote in a new editorial published shortly after the committee adjourned. Their change of heart is notable because Kavanaugh graduated from Georgetown Prep, a Jesuit school.

Advertisement

The editors admit they "have no special insight into who is telling the truth." Still, it appears as though they've chosen a side.

If Dr. Blasey’s allegation is true, the assault and Judge Kavanaugh’s denial of it mean that he should not be seated on the U.S. Supreme Court. But even if the credibility of the allegation has not been established beyond a reasonable doubt and even if further investigation is warranted to determine its validity or clear Judge Kavanaugh’s name, we recognize that this nomination is no longer in the best interests of the country. While we previously endorsed the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh on the basis of his legal credentials and his reputation as a committed textualist, it is now clear that the nomination should be withdrawn.

His nomination, they declare, has become "a referendum on how to address allegations of sexual assault." They can't help but view the nomination in light of the "Me Too" era.

What is different this time is that this nomination battle is no longer purely about predicting the likely outcome of Judge Kavanaugh’s vote on the court. It now involves the symbolic meaning of his nomination and confirmation in the #MeToo era. The hearings and the committee’s deliberations are now also a bellwether of the way the country treats women when their reports of harassment, assault and abuse threaten to derail the careers of powerful men.

Advertisement

Related:

SEXUAL ASSAULT

At Thursday's hearing, Kavanaugh was a man determined to defend his honor. He vehemently denied all allegations against him, including those of Christine Blasey Ford, who had just testified before him. She accused him of sexually assaulting her in high school. She is "100 percent" certain it was Kavanaugh. He was just as certain that she has the wrong guy.

That may be true, but Kavanaugh bowing out of the Supreme Court running is "the best of the bad resolutions," the editors conclude. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos