Why Pierre Poilievre Got Ejected from the Canadian House of Commons
Top Biden DOJ Official Busted for Lying About Past Arrest
Kristi Noem Has a New Explanation for Why She Shot Her Dog
Can the Current Universities Be Saved?
A ‘Morning Joe’ Exclusive Column: It Was One Long, Problematic Morning Indeed at...
Joe Biden, Dearborn Shahid, Commits Political Suicide via Hamas Appeasement
The Public Doesn't Trust the 'Democracy-Saving' Media
Taxpayers Are Subsidizing College Extremism
Radical Leftists Claim Oil Companies Are Committing Climate Murder
Inflation Reduction Act's Dirty Little Secret: Largest Premium Increase Ever for Medicare...
Biden Administration Continues to Misdiagnose and Mistreat the Violent Crime Problem
A Lack of Imagination
Democrat Unity on Border Crisis Showing Signs of Cracking
Did the House of Representatives Just Outlaw Quoting Parts of the New Testament?
Blinken, the Terminator
Tipsheet

Will the New York Times Fix This Headline About Pompeo?

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, we now know, made his unannounced trip to North Korea earlier this week in order to secure the release of three American hostages. It was an incredible feat of diplomacy, and the three newly freed men touched down in the States early Thursday morning. 

Advertisement

It all makes this New York Times headline pretty regrettable.

In the piece, the writer suggests that Pompeo's absence during President Trump's Iran Deal announcement is reminiscent of former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson's "irrelevance." 

Mr. Trump soon replaced Mr. Tillerson with Mike Pompeo, who has promised to bring back the State Department’s “swagger” and import. But on Tuesday, when Mr. Trump made what could be the most significant diplomatic announcement of his presidency — that he would exit the Iran nuclear agreement — his chief diplomat was again thousands of miles away, this time on an unannounced visit to Pyongyang, the North’s capital, to lay further groundwork for a summit meeting between Mr. Kim and Mr. Trump.

The absence of Mr. Pompeo and other top State Department officials left perplexed European diplomats privately complaining that they were having trouble getting answers from Washington, and created an uncertainty about what was next that spanned the Atlantic Ocean.

While Pompeo could have been contacted midflight, the secretary’s "aging plane has such poor equipment that calls are often dropped midsentence," the Times made sure to note.

Of course, at the time, the editors did not know why Pompeo had hopped on a plane. The secretary of state had simply told the Times and other press that he was on his way to North Korea to prepare for upcoming summit between Trump and Kim Jong Un. For security reasons, presumably, he did not discuss the hostages.

Advertisement

Quite the opposite of "irrelevancy," Pompeo was en route to North Korea in lock step with the president's agenda, ready to pull off an incredible achievement for both the administration and the country.

The Times got a public rebuke from White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders at Wednesday's press briefing. How dare the outlet suggest Pompeo was "AWOL" when indeed he was embarking on a significant trip.

While Trump's Iran deal decision was important, I'd guess that Pompeo securing the release of American prisoners is a little more urgent than standing next to the president at the White House for a photo op.

Will the Times issue a correction?

The freed hostages, Kim Dong Chul, Kim Hak-song and Kim Sang Duk, arrived safely at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland a little after 3 a.m. on Thursday. The Trump-Kim Jong Un summit is expected to take place next month in Singapore.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement