It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Tipsheet

Shaun King Fumes that South Carolina Democrats Co-Sponsored Bill to Ban Baggy Pants

Shaun King Fumes that South Carolina Democrats Co-Sponsored Bill to Ban Baggy Pants

Author and civil rights activist Shaun King thinks a group of South Carolina Democrats have their priorities backwards after introducing a bill that would dole out punishments to individuals for wearing baggy pants.

Advertisement

House Bill 4957 would make it illegal for a person to expose their skin or underwear by wearing their pants "three inches below the crest of his ileum" —the top of the hips.

Violation fines equal just enough to buy that much needed belt: $25 for a first offense; $50 or three hours of community service for a second offense; and $75 or six hours of community service for a third or subsequent offense. (WLTX19)

Why are these politicians worried more about appearances than gun violence? he wondered.

He became angrier when he realized some of the bill's primary co-sponsors are Democrats.

Advertisement

Related:

SOUTH CAROLINA

The ACLU of Virginia has been retweeting social media users who claim the bill will give police an excuse to let police stop and harass black men. It is "racist, dangerous, and unconstitutional" some argue.

A representative from the ACLU of South Carolina, meanwhile, claims that the lawmakers are trying to divert attention from the more pressing issue of gerrymandering.

"This bill is a waste of taxpayers’ money and an attempt to sustain debtor’s prisons in South Carolina," ACLU of South Carolina Executive Director Shaundra Young Scott told the New York Daily News.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement