This Town Filled Its Coffers With a Traffic Shakedown Scheme – Now They...
USAID You Want a Revolution?
Roy Cooper Dodges Tough Questions About His Deadly Soft-on-Crime Policies
Colorado Democrats Want to Trample First, Second Amendments With Latest Bill
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
White House Religious Liberty Commission Member Removed After Hijacking Antisemitism Heari...
Federal Judge Blocks Pete Hegseth From Reducing Sen. Mark Kelly's Pay Over 'Seditious...
AG Pam Bondi Vows to Prosecute Threats Against Lawmakers, Even Across Party Lines
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fights Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Georgia Man Sentenced to Over 3 Years in Prison for TikTok Threats to...
Walz Administration Claims $217M in Fraud After Prosecutor Pointed to Billions
2 Pakistani Nationals Charged in $10M Medicare Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Federal Court Rejects Trump Admin's Bid to Delay EPA Regulation on Drilling

Federal Court Rejects Trump Admin's Bid to Delay EPA Regulation on Drilling

President Trump scored a court victory last week when the Supreme Court reinstated part of his controversial travel order. It was a win for national security, he and his supporters cheered. Yet, his deregulatory agenda hit a snag in the courts Monday, as the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that his administration cannot delay EPA rules put in place by Obama to limit drilling.

Advertisement

Obama's EPA set out to place methane emissions standards at drilling sites. Environmentalists argue it is a necessary mandate to prevent leaks of a powerful greenhouse gas and other pollutants, reports The Hill. Yet, the Trump administration aimed to change course, charging that the rules were unfair to stakeholders who had no opportunity to comment on some parts of the final regulation.

Yet, the rule must stand, according to the circuit court judges.

“The administrative record thus makes clear that industry groups had ample opportunity to comment on all four issues on which EPA granted reconsideration, and indeed, that in several instances the agency incorporated those comments directly into the final rule,” two of the judges on the three-judge panel wrote.

“Because it was thus not ‘impracticable’ for industry groups to have raised such objections during the notice and comment period [the Clean Air Act] did not require reconsideration and did not authorize the stay.”
Advertisement

The EPA, led by Administrator Scott Pruitt, has not been totally stymied by the court, however. The agency is on his way to rolling back at least 30 Obama-era regulations. One of the most notable reversals so far was President Trump's decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accords - a deal Trump said would have badly damaged our economy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement