Hegseth Responded Perfectly to the Libs' Uproar Over Our Air Campaign Against Narco-Terror...
Walk, Don't Run, Concerning This Latest Development About the J6 Pipe Bomb Suspect
Lawmaker Under Fire for Representing Somalia Instead of Her Constituents
Supreme Court Just Agreed to Rule on This Controversial Immigration-Related Executive Orde...
Yes, Richard Gere, Illegal Immigrants Are (D)ifferent
Check Out What This Chinese Communist Agent Said About NY Governor Kathy Hochul
The Media's Latest Defense of Minnesota's Somali Community Fails Basic Math
Green New Deal Countdown: Ocasio-Cortez Stays Silent Amid Retreat of Climate Alarmism
JD Vance Blasts 'Bullsh*t Narrative’ Blaming Trump Administration for Biden’s Economy
The Book (and the Monk) Behind the Pope
Two Illinois Brothers Indicted in $293M COVID Testing Fraud Scheme
Woman Charged With Smuggling Aliens Through Canada
Maxine Waters Calls Trump a Killer For Destroying NarcoTerrorists
ATMs Help Trace $250K Unemployment Fraud Scheme to Michigan Government Employee and Partne...
Prosecutors: Ex-Contractors Wiped 96 Government Databases in Retaliatory Plot
Tipsheet

Justice Don Willett Questioned About Tweet Suggesting He'd Support Human/Bacon Marriage

During his confirmation hearing on Wednesday, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) asked 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Don Willett to explain one of his tweets where he said that he would support a constitutional right to marry bacon. Leahy suggested that the tweet indicated that Willett would not respect precedent if he were confirmed to the court.

Advertisement

The tweet: 

The tweet in question was sent on April 30, 2015, two days after oral arguments were heard by the Supreme Court in the Obergefell v. Hodges case. The decision was announced on June 26, 2015. Willett (erroneously) said that it was made after the decision was issued, and was his attempt to "inject a bit of levity" to a "divisive time." 

"Senator, I believe every American is entitled to equal worth and dignity. I've never intended to disparage anyone, and would never do so. That's not where my heart is," Willett explained. Leahy seemed unwavered.

Earlier in the hearing, Leahy said that Willett's tweet about a male-to-female transgender athlete joining a softball team was offensive, and meant that Willett would not be fair to a case involving an LGBTQ person. That tweet was made on February 14, 2014. Willett explained that the tweet was intended to be a reference to former New York Yankees player Alex Rodriguez, (who had recently dropped a lawsuit against the MLB and serve a yearlong suspension) not the transgender athlete.

Advertisement

I mean, come on. Both of those tweets were clearly jokes, and Willett was officially named the "Tweeter Laureate" of Texas in 2015. It's not a good look to be so incredibly humourless that you'd attack a person for tweets that were not intended to be serious. Willett should be judged on the merits of his decisions, not for his 140-character bursts. (Which are, admittedly, quite funny.) 

Since he was nominated to the court, he has ceased his Twitter use, save this tweet earlier on Wednesday:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement