Is There Anything More Annoying Than Europeans Complaining About America?
Marjorie Taylor Greene Is Plotting Something Totally Insane Against Speaker Johnson
How Congress Is Planning to Screw Around With Trump's Anti-Narco-Terrorist Campaign
CNN Host: No Evidence That Trump's Wannabe Assassin Was...Anti-Trump
J6 Pipe Bomb Suspect Had This Online Obsession. It's Not What You Think.
Here's What Former-Anti-Trump Special Counsel Jack Smith Is Up to Now
Wisconsin Gubernatorial Mandela Barnes Just Lost a Key Endorsement
Turns Out the COVID Vaccine Critics Were Right All Along
Wisconsin Supreme Court Seeks to Defy Federal ICE Detainers. There's Just One Problem.
First Lady Melania Trump Teases New Legislative Initiative in 2026
Tokyo Tucker
GAO Provides Yet More Evidence for Why Enhanced Obamacare Subsidies Must Expire
Student Loan Forgiveness: A Band-Aid on a Trillion-Dollar Wound
The Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Organization
Congress Should End Brazen Disregard for Student Privacy, Parental Rights
Tipsheet

Did The Supreme Court Pick Just Leak On Twitter?

UPDATE: Uh, maybe yes?

Neil Gorsuch was in fact nominated to the Supreme Court, and the account is now unlocked. However, this doesn't mean it's his actual account.

Advertisement

Stay tuned?

---Original Post---

As we all know, President Donald Trump will be making his pick for the Supreme Court tonight at 8 p.m. Eastern. However, due to an awkward Twitter mishap, the pick may have already leaked: Justice Neil Gorsuch.

A protected, private account with the handle @JusticeNGorsuch with the bio "Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States" appeared shortly before 1 p.m. on Tuesday. As Gorsuch's account is locked, it is impossible to see who are the 22 people following the account and the seven people that the account follows. The account also has two unknown tweets.

While it's entirely possible that this is a parody or joke account, there does not appear to be a similar account for the other reported "finalist" for the spot, Justice Thomas Hardiman. Hardiman's relatively empty Twitter handle does not mention the Supreme Court.

It's entirely possible that the person who created the account assumed that protected accounts could not be seen nor would be visible in search. Clearly, this isn't correct.

We'll know in about seven hours if this "leak" turns out to be correct.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement