An Anti-ICE Activist Tried Interfering With an Arrest in California. Guess What Happened...
CNN Hosts Peddled a Lie About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting..and DHS Wasn't Gonna...
NYC Official Who Mocked Charlie Kirk's Death Is In Deep Trouble
Zohran Mamdani’s Exploitation of Black Voters Represents Everything I Hate About Democrats
Watch Tim Walz Make a Fool Out of Himself Yet Again
No More Taxes Until the Fraud Stops
She's At It Again: Candace Owens Claims Charlie Kirk Was a Time Traveler
Border Czar Tom Homan Warns Anti-ICE Rhetoric Could Spark More Bloodshed
Gutfeld Eviscerates Jessica Tarlov for Defending Protesters Harassing ICE Agents
‘They Are Killing Their Own Children’: Iranian Commander’s Daughter Speaks Out Amid Nation...
Trump Threatens to Tariff Countries Opposing His Effort to Control Greenland
DOJ Reportedly Investigating Tim Walz, Jacob Frey Over Impeding ICE
COVID Cash Heist: Michigan Woman Gets 27 Months Behind Bars for $3M Scheme
Five Florida Eye Practices to Pay Nearly $6M to Settle False Claims Act...
Law Enforcement Arrests Alleged Gang Member Who Stole Weapon, Vandalized ICE Vehicle
Tipsheet

Did The Supreme Court Pick Just Leak On Twitter?

UPDATE: Uh, maybe yes?

Neil Gorsuch was in fact nominated to the Supreme Court, and the account is now unlocked. However, this doesn't mean it's his actual account.

Advertisement

Stay tuned?

---Original Post---

As we all know, President Donald Trump will be making his pick for the Supreme Court tonight at 8 p.m. Eastern. However, due to an awkward Twitter mishap, the pick may have already leaked: Justice Neil Gorsuch.

A protected, private account with the handle @JusticeNGorsuch with the bio "Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States" appeared shortly before 1 p.m. on Tuesday. As Gorsuch's account is locked, it is impossible to see who are the 22 people following the account and the seven people that the account follows. The account also has two unknown tweets.

While it's entirely possible that this is a parody or joke account, there does not appear to be a similar account for the other reported "finalist" for the spot, Justice Thomas Hardiman. Hardiman's relatively empty Twitter handle does not mention the Supreme Court.

It's entirely possible that the person who created the account assumed that protected accounts could not be seen nor would be visible in search. Clearly, this isn't correct.

We'll know in about seven hours if this "leak" turns out to be correct.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos