This Image Says Everything About Trump's White House Correspondents' Association Dinner Sp...
Wait, Is Troy Jackson Eligible to Replace Graham Platner?
How This State Is Starting to Comply With the New Mood Over Election...
Former MSNBC Analyst Admits Republicans Were Right About This Regarding Our Elections
GOP Sends Letter to NJ Governor: What the Hell Happened to Your Voter...
Democrats Do Not Speak for All Women
The Kind of People Who Run for Government Office
On National Parents’ Day, Remember: Parents—Not the State—Know and Love Their Children Bes...
The Unlikely Incubators of Liberty
Twelve Indicted in Alleged $2 Million Nike Cargo Theft Conspiracy in Memphis
Four Men Plead Guilty in $2.2 Million Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Troy Jackson Crowned As New Maine Senate Nominee
We Now Have the Truth About That Viral ICE Story That Sparked Massive...
The Process to Replace Graham Platner Is Already Off to a Rough Start...
The Conservative Case for American Cement
Tipsheet

Did The Supreme Court Pick Just Leak On Twitter?

Did The Supreme Court Pick Just Leak On Twitter?

UPDATE: Uh, maybe yes?

Neil Gorsuch was in fact nominated to the Supreme Court, and the account is now unlocked. However, this doesn't mean it's his actual account.

Advertisement

Stay tuned?

---Original Post---

As we all know, President Donald Trump will be making his pick for the Supreme Court tonight at 8 p.m. Eastern. However, due to an awkward Twitter mishap, the pick may have already leaked: Justice Neil Gorsuch.

A protected, private account with the handle @JusticeNGorsuch with the bio "Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States" appeared shortly before 1 p.m. on Tuesday. As Gorsuch's account is locked, it is impossible to see who are the 22 people following the account and the seven people that the account follows. The account also has two unknown tweets.

While it's entirely possible that this is a parody or joke account, there does not appear to be a similar account for the other reported "finalist" for the spot, Justice Thomas Hardiman. Hardiman's relatively empty Twitter handle does not mention the Supreme Court.

It's entirely possible that the person who created the account assumed that protected accounts could not be seen nor would be visible in search. Clearly, this isn't correct.

We'll know in about seven hours if this "leak" turns out to be correct.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement