The Worst Day of the Year Has Arrived. How Trump and the Republicans...
What Nancy Pelosi Said About Eric Swalwell Is Flat-Out Unbelievable
Here's When Ruben Gallego Froze When Asked About the Rumors Surrounding Pal, Eric...
Here's Joe Biden Awkward Moment With a Black Man at Syracuse University
Speaker Johnson Says This Dem Rep Has to Go
Leftists Mobs Violently Attacked a TPUSA Journalist. Will They Face Justice?
The 'Universal Healthcare' Democrats Want Is a Death Sentence
Why Is the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Hiding Public School Spending Data?
A 'British National' Murdered Two Women, Including a DHS Employee, in Georgia
Tom Homan Has the Perfect Response for Catholic Leaders Complaining About Immigration Enfo...
A U.K. Headteacher Warned People About the Southport Terrorist, Guess Why She Was...
Mamdani's Government-Run Grocery Store Plan Gets Even Worse
Trump’s Not Wrong on the Euros
Hasan Piker: 'The Fall of the USSR Was One of the Greatest Catastrophes...
A Top Democrat in California's Governor Race Just Vowed to Take the Most...
Tipsheet

Did The Supreme Court Pick Just Leak On Twitter?

Did The Supreme Court Pick Just Leak On Twitter?

UPDATE: Uh, maybe yes?

Neil Gorsuch was in fact nominated to the Supreme Court, and the account is now unlocked. However, this doesn't mean it's his actual account.

Advertisement

Stay tuned?

---Original Post---

As we all know, President Donald Trump will be making his pick for the Supreme Court tonight at 8 p.m. Eastern. However, due to an awkward Twitter mishap, the pick may have already leaked: Justice Neil Gorsuch.

A protected, private account with the handle @JusticeNGorsuch with the bio "Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States" appeared shortly before 1 p.m. on Tuesday. As Gorsuch's account is locked, it is impossible to see who are the 22 people following the account and the seven people that the account follows. The account also has two unknown tweets.

While it's entirely possible that this is a parody or joke account, there does not appear to be a similar account for the other reported "finalist" for the spot, Justice Thomas Hardiman. Hardiman's relatively empty Twitter handle does not mention the Supreme Court.

It's entirely possible that the person who created the account assumed that protected accounts could not be seen nor would be visible in search. Clearly, this isn't correct.

We'll know in about seven hours if this "leak" turns out to be correct.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement