Is Hollywood Unwokening?
Columbia University's Pro-Hamas Activists Vow to Defend Camp Against Police Action
Capitalism Versus Racism
Groupthink Chorus Emerges at Trump Trial
Anti-Censorship Group Canceled by Pro-Hamas Authors
Mike Johnson Is a Hero
City Where Emergency Response Time Is 36 Minutes Wants to Ban Civilians Carrying...
There's No Right to Sleep Outdoors
State Department: Ukraine Has 'Significant' Human Rights Issues
The Alarming Implications of Trump's Immunity Claim
In Every Generation They Try to Destroy Us
Love to See It: Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Ted Cruz Fight to Protect Public...
1968 Returns as Biden’s Nightmare
The Greatest Challenge to DeSantis' Legacy in Florida
Senate Passes Foreign Aid Package, Sending It to President Biden to Sign
Tipsheet

Huntsman's Real Problem

Sure, there is legitimate criticism to be made of Jon Huntsman for his previous fulsome praise of President Obama as a "remarkable leader" (and admittedly, it would make for some awkward attack ads if he were, in fact the nominee).
Advertisement

But contrary to what Huntsman seems to think, the Republican base has failed to warm to him -- not because he has nobly "put his country first" in serving as Obama's ambassador to China -- but because he's run a terrible campaign.

His economic record is actually pretty conservative.  But when your campaign's opening shot is a snarky tweet about your "crazy" belief in evolution and global warming,  you're displaying the same kind of smug, elitist (and ignorant) contempt for conservatives and Republicans that usually emanates from, say, people obsessed with the status of American contraception. When you suggest, again, that the party you're hoping to represent is currently not entirely "sane" (and then have to clarify the remark), you've definitely got a problem.

Projecting an air of moral superiority and indulging in the occasional bit of sanctimonious hectoring from the debate platform likewise isn't going to win you a lot of hearts and minds.
Advertisement

Either Huntsman himself is the worst politician known to man, or he accepted the worst political advice known to man.  Why on earth would he think he would benefit from repeatedly insulting the people whose support he needs (in a manner reminiscent of the worst of left-wing "culture"), and by underplaying the genuinely conservative parts of his record?

Perhaps he will continue to purvey the comforting fiction that it was his statesmanlike public service for a Democrat that did him in.  Except that it wasn't.  It was the tone of the man and the tenor of the campaign he ran.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement