It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
Lisa Murkowski Got Cooked by This Community Note Over Her SAVE Act Stance
House Dem Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About the DHS Funding Fight
Georgia Is Trying to Prevent a 'Renee Good' Situation in the State. It...
RFK Revealed Why He Wasn't Scared of COVID...It Was a Legendary Answer
L.A. County Supervisors Just Voted to Hike the Price of Groceries
We Regret to Inform You That Democrats Are Grilling Again
Kansas City Police Are Searching for Woman Who Set Fire to Rumored ICE...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Tipsheet

Forced to Choose Between Faith or Fines, Little Sisters of the Poor Appeal to the Supreme Court

 Forced to Choose Between Faith or Fines, Little Sisters of the Poor Appeal to the Supreme Court

When a federal appeals court ruled against the Little Sisters of the Poor earlier this month, forcing them to comply with Obamacare’s abortion mandate, the Catholic group’s attorneys over at The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty promised they weren’t done fighting.

Advertisement

Today, they’ve made good on that promise by appealing the ruling to the Supreme Court, which makes the second time in just two short years they’ve had to ask the high court to intervene because the government is trying to force the Little Sisters to choose between their faith and continuing their work serving the elderly poor.

“The government has lost every single time they have made these arguments before the Supreme Court—including last year’s landmark Hobby Lobby case. One would think they would get the message and stop pressuring the Sisters,” Mark Rienzi, Senior Counsel of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and lead attorney for the Little Sisters of the Poor, said in a statement. “The government is willing to exempt big companies like Exxon, Chevron, and Pepsi Bottling, but it won’t leave the Little Sisters alone.”

He continued: “The Sisters consider it immoral to help the government distribute these drugs. But instead of simply exempting them, the government insists that it can take over their ministry’s employee healthcare to distribute these drugs to their employees, while dismissing the Sisters’ moral objections as irrelevant. In America, judges and government bureaucrats have no authority to tell the Little Sisters what is moral or immoral. And the government can distribute its drugs without nuns—it has its own healthcare exchanges that can provide whatever it wants.”

Advertisement

The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and leading Supreme Court advocate Paul Clement—the same legal team that won Hobby Lobby—filed the petition on behalf of the Little Sisters as well as the Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Reaching Souls International, Truett-McConnell College, and GuideStone Financial Resources of the Southern Baptist Convention. They are seeking relief from a 100-page decision by the Tenth Circuit that disagrees with the ministries’ understanding of moral theology. Today’s petition is the fifth the Court has received and makes it likely the Court will decide in the upcoming term whether religious ministries, like religious for-profits, will receive protection from the Mandate. […]

Reaching Souls International is an evangelical Christian ministry dedicated to preaching the gospel and caring for orphans in Africa, Cuba and India. Truett-McConnell College is a Baptist college that trains students to share their faith worldwide. Christian Brothers Services, Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, and GuideStone Financial Resources are the ministries that provide healthcare coverage for the Little Sisters, Reaching Souls, and Truett-McConnell. All of the ministries are also represented by Locke Lord LLP, the 2014 recipient of Becket’s legal service award. Kevin Walsh, a law professor at the University of Richmond Law School, also represents the Little Sisters of the Poor. […]

The Court is likely to consider all of the petitions in late September or early October. If the petition is granted, the case would be argued and decided before the end of the Court’s term in June 2016.

Advertisement

“We hope the Supreme Court will hear our case and ensure that people from diverse faiths can freely follow God’s calling in their lives,” Sr. Loraine Marie Maguire, Mother Provincial of the Little Sisters of the Poor, said in a statement. “We perform this loving ministry because of our faith and simply cannot choose between our care for the elderly poor and our faith, and we shouldn’t have to.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement