Trump Is Right About the Panama Canal
We're a Coalition That Has to Work Through Disagreements
You Don't Need to Get Past the Second Paragraph to Know This Politico...
CNN Reporter Has a Shocking Take on Joe Biden's Legacy
Fani Willis Gets Some More Bad News
Guess Who a Majority of Americans Blame for the UnitedHealthcare CEO Shooting
New Poll Reveals How Americans Feel About Political News Right Now
Brand New Photos Expose Joe Biden's Lies About Involvement With Hunter's Business Dealings
Scott Jennings Has Some Thoughts About Vivek Ramaswamy's Tweet Calling Americans Lazy, Med...
Celebrating Media Mayhem with the Heckler Awards - Part 4: The Individual Categories
Morrison Hotel, Made Famous By the Doors, Burns Down After Squatters Refuse to...
Trump Asks Supreme Court to Delay TikTok Ban
Why Does Bill Gates Want to Visit Trump at Mar-a-Lago?
The New York Times Celebrates Faith Leaders Who Bless Abortion Clinics
Retiring Congresswoman Torches Older Democrats for Staying in Congress ‘Forever’
Tipsheet

Finally: McMahon Ties Blumenthal to Chris Dodd in Connecticut

In an 11th hour revelation, Linda McMahon's Senate campaign has at last* remembered there's a reason why she's running against Dick Blumenthal instead of the incumbent, Chris Dodd:
Advertisement


(Feb 2009) The Quinnipiac University poll puts Dodd's approval rating at 41 percent with a 48 percent disapproval rating marking his worst approval rating in the history of the Quinnipiac poll.   By a 54-24 margin, voters surveyed say they aren't satisfied with Dodd's explanation of the loans and 51 percent of say they "probably won't" or "definitely won't" vote for him.  These terrible numbers come after a steady drumbeat of critical editorials in Connecticut newspapers.

McMahon has launched a new ad reminding voters of exactly why they were prepared to toss Dodd out of the Senate before he beat them to the punch with a surprise retirement announcement.  By raising the specter of the Countrywide mortgage scandal, McMahon's campaign is tying her current opponent to his corrupt ally and predecessor and implicitly making the case for a clean break:



Hmmm.  Saddling a political opponent with the humiliating record of his discredited, corrupt Democratic predecessor?  I'm no expert, but perhaps another Republican might want to give that a shot.

*In fairness to McMahon, when it comes to criticizing Blumenthal, there's no shortage of fodder.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement