Sorry Dems, Affordability Is Trump's Strength
We Got Him: Brown University Shooter Found Dead in New Hampshire
Retirement Accounts Come Roaring Back in 2025
Trump's National Speech Has the Press Spinning Wildly, Leading to Dizzying Partisan Analys...
Judge Hannah Dugan Found Guilty of Felony Obstruction, Not Guilty of Misdemeanor Charge
Chanukah Is Relevant for Everyone – but Not in the Way You Might...
Animal Rights Grinches Target NJ Fish and Game Council
Yes, Chabad
Ilhan Omar Can Accuse ICE With No Proof
We Have Reached the Emily Litella Moment on Climate Change
Another Jewish Massacre on a Jewish Holy Day Is a Wake-Up Call to...
Virginia’s Incoming Democratic Governor Doubles Down on Bias
It Will Be Okay
Jon Ossoff Is Just Another Elitist Liberal
54 Charged in Nationwide ATM Jackpotting Scheme Linked to Venezuelan Terror Group
Tipsheet

Finally: McMahon Ties Blumenthal to Chris Dodd in Connecticut

In an 11th hour revelation, Linda McMahon's Senate campaign has at last* remembered there's a reason why she's running against Dick Blumenthal instead of the incumbent, Chris Dodd:
Advertisement


(Feb 2009) The Quinnipiac University poll puts Dodd's approval rating at 41 percent with a 48 percent disapproval rating marking his worst approval rating in the history of the Quinnipiac poll.   By a 54-24 margin, voters surveyed say they aren't satisfied with Dodd's explanation of the loans and 51 percent of say they "probably won't" or "definitely won't" vote for him.  These terrible numbers come after a steady drumbeat of critical editorials in Connecticut newspapers.

McMahon has launched a new ad reminding voters of exactly why they were prepared to toss Dodd out of the Senate before he beat them to the punch with a surprise retirement announcement.  By raising the specter of the Countrywide mortgage scandal, McMahon's campaign is tying her current opponent to his corrupt ally and predecessor and implicitly making the case for a clean break:



Hmmm.  Saddling a political opponent with the humiliating record of his discredited, corrupt Democratic predecessor?  I'm no expert, but perhaps another Republican might want to give that a shot.

*In fairness to McMahon, when it comes to criticizing Blumenthal, there's no shortage of fodder.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement