It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
OPINION

FDA’s Proposed Menthol Ban Will Increase Cartel Profits and Crime

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
FDA’s Proposed Menthol Ban Will Increase Cartel Profits and Crime

Editor's note: This piece was authored by Jonathan W. Plante.

The Food and Drug Administration’s pending ban on the distribution of menthol cigarettes could be announced as early as September. While the FDA’s intentions may be pure, all this ban would do is increase crime in the US.

Advertisement

The aim of this proposal is to reduce addiction and cigarette related deaths among youth and young adults. According to the FDA, menthol cigarettes make it easier for people — especially youth and young adults — to deal with the harshness of cigarettes. In other words, menthol makes it easier for first time smokers to get through their first pack of cigarettes and, as a result, get addicted. 

The FDA’s claims have been researched and reiterated by “Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids,” an anti-tobacco organization. CTFK goes even further than the FDA, claiming a ban on menthol cigarettes would not only decrease deaths and addiction in Black American communities, but also reduce health disparities among Black Americans and other races. 

Clearly, the proposal to ban menthol cigarettes has a noble aim. Still, it is doubtful that the ban will reduce addiction or the number of cigarette related deaths. The problem with simply taxing or banning a product is that it doesn’t stop consumers from wanting it. And when consumers want something, the market moves to fulfill that demand by any means necessary.

Banning menthol cigarettes won’t stop their production or distribution, it will just change the channels by which they are produced and distributed. It will increase the market for smuggled cigarettes — mainly among drug cartels. 

Some have claimed that this proposed ban will increase crime at the border. Others go a step further and name Mexico’s Cártel de Jalisco Nueva Generación (CJNG) as the cartel that will profit from this proposed ban. 

Advertisement

Related:

BIG GOVERNMENT

Yes, as previously mentioned, the ban has noble intentions. Moral people want to support noble causes. 

However, noble causes often have unintended consequences. It’s the “Baptist and Bootlegger” phenomenon. Behind every “Baptist” — a do-gooder, or a public-spirited individual or group — is a bootlegger who can profit off Baptists’ noble motivations. 

Baptists in this case are groups like Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Bootleggers are groups like CJNG who can provide consumers with menthol cigarettes despite the ban. 

It doesn’t matter how pure the Baptist’s motives are, the only effect of their noble ban will be more crime and more profits for criminals.

Don’t believe this is possible? Visit the interactive map published by Mackinac Center for Public Policy. This map provides 2021 data on tax revenue and smuggling rates for states that have issued taxes on menthol cigarettes. 

At one extreme are states with high taxes like New York and Massachusetts — which had per pack taxes of $4.35 and $3.51, respectively. These high taxes had negative impacts on tax revenue — with a revenue loss of $1.1 million for New York and $2.2 million for Massachusetts. Both states also had high smuggling rates. New York had the highest in the nation at 54%. Massachusetts had a rate of 38%. 

Compare these data to states with low taxes like North Dakota or Nebraska. North Dakota had a tax rate of $0.44 per pack. This low tax resulted in a revenue gain of $2.5 million and a negative smuggling rate of -15.2%. Similar results occurred in Nebraska, which had a tax of $0.64. Revenue was $1.3 million, and smuggling was -2.7%. 

Advertisement

One could object that these data are from states — and, as such, the conclusions wouldn’t apply to the entire country. However, the fact that these phenomena are occurring at the state-level is precisely why one should be worried it would happen at the national level. If states can’t even stop smuggling, it is doubtful a nation can. 

We as a nation are left with a choice. We have to decide if this increase in crime is worth a well-intentioned ban that won’t decrease addiction, death, or health disparities. There are better solutions, and those are worth researching. 

Jonathan W. Plante is a Ph.D. candidate at George Mason University and a Young Voices contributor. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement