Frivolity in Legislation

Paul  Weyrich
|
Posted: Jun 19, 2008 11:44 AM
Frivolity in Legislation

While Americans suffer economic woes due in part to legislative regulation, such as ethanol mandates and subsidies, Congress has been busy solving America's problems. At least that is what many of our elected officials would have us believe. But a closer look at some of the legislation passed this month reveals that Congressional business is as frivolous as it ever has been.

Among the many bills the House of Representatives passed on June 3, 2008, three stand out as both unnecessary and extending the purview of Congressional power. The first of these bills was H.R. 4106, the Telework Improvements Act of 2008. And what important business does this law address? It requires "the head of each executive agency to establish a policy under which employees may be authorized to telework [e.g., work from home]." Employees who are authorized to telework must "be allowed to telework at least 20% of the hours worked in every two administrative workweeks." The legislation then goes on to state that "the opportunity to telework [should be] made available to employees to the maximum extent possible without diminishing employee performance or agency operations." Finally, H.R. 4106 requires each executive agency in the Federal Government to have "a Telework Managing Officer" and requires the Comptroller General to report annually to Congressional committees about "agency telework policies, participation, and practices."

The second piece of legislation is H.R. 3774, the Senior Executive Service Diversity Assurance Act. This bill requires "the Director of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to establish within OPM the Senior Executive Service Resource Office to make recommendations to the Director with respect to regulations, and to provide guidance to agencies, concerning the diverse composition of the Senior Executive Service (SES)." The purpose of the new office, as stated in one of the titles on the bill, is to provide greater diversity within the SES. It should be noted that "Members of the SES serve in the key positions just below the top Presidential appointees," according to OPM's website. "SES members are the major link between these appointees and the rest of the Federal work force. They operate and oversee nearly every government activity in approximately 75 Federal agencies."

Finally, there is S. 2420, the Federal Food Donation Act of 2008. This bill requires "all government contracts above $25,000 for the provision, service, or sale of food in the United States, or for the lease or rental of federal property to a private entity for events at which food is provided in the United States, to include [a] clause that encourage[s] the donation of excess, apparently wholesome food to nonprofit organizations that provide assistance to people with inconsistent access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food." Curiously, in one of the titles to the bill, people who lack adequate food are referred to as "food-insecure people in the United States." This is surely taking politically correct language to new heights (or depths, depending upon one's perception of such language).

Thus, instead of tackling difficult but pertinent legislation, such as building new oil refineries, allowing oil companies to drill in ANWR and the ocean, and reducing the cost of healthcare by making it nationally competitive (rather than only allowing people to purchase it in their home state), Congress is busy passing legislation requiring diversity in executive agencies, allowing Federal Government personnel to work 20% of the time from home, and requiring that leftover food at government functions be donated to those who do not have enough to eat. While the last is surely a laudable goal, requiring that all government contracts include a clause to "encourage" such behavior is redundant and unnecessary.

This, my fellow Americans, is our government in action. One may wonder what ever happened to the statesman, that man or woman who could exercise political leadership with wisdom and without partisan rancor while addressing the genuine needs of the country which fell within the Federal Government's enumerated powers, difficult though those needs might be. Such a figure is rarely to be found in the current Congress. What we are left with instead is petty bickering, an avoidance of responsibility, a flurry of wasteful legislation, and deceptiveness in addressing the public on issues of greatest concern to the majority of American citizens. The worst part about this: there is more to come.