How to Stifle Speech

Even Fox News censors itself on the topic of Islam due to large ownership stakes of Muslims in their operation. Islam will get its way, one way or another. That is why it cannot be allowed in the West. Whether it is hate speech laws or the free market system, whatever it is they will take advantage of whatever any system offers to shut down all criticism of Islam ultimately ensuring that the host society never is able to adequately discuss the problem of Islam and deal with it.

As Winston Churchill 'd say: "He who plays the politics of appeasement, is like the encaged man who feeds the crocodile hoping to be eaten last." That's what the Yale university does with their rights of free press, creating a dangerous precedent in self-censoring towards others. By censoring yourself, you censor others too. Yuo will be eaten anyway.

I've read about that "book about the drawings without the drawings acually in it", as we call it here in Europe. A lot of us had a great laugh about the uselessnes, as my nick already suggests. Is it "a picture can capt a 1000 words" or "a word depict 1000 vieuws"? Such stuff.

Anyway, if that became the result of the donation-system, it should be changed. (Go find Obama, got...

It does not matter if you pass laws or call on people to stand up for their rights and speak their mind, Islam stifles free speech through violence. Very few people are willing to die just to speak the truth about Islam. If you go onto any corner in America and speak the truth about Islam eventually some Muslims will notice and you will be killed. THAT silences free speech, and there is NOTHING that can be done about it except stopping the spread of Islam in America and reversing what has occurred. It is just a cold hard fact that as the number of Muslims increase you WILL lose more and more rights, not only freedom of speech, and it won't matter if you take it all the way to the supreme court. The only people who will have freedom of...

The most laughable thing is that the left-wing, socialist dhimocrats that cozy to the jihadi-Islamists, would also be just as readily persecuted themselves as soon as the JIs got any power.
Loud feminist? Burkacized.
Gay marriage. Lets all get stoned, er, stoning.
Lefty movie-maker? Little religious policing.
Sexual freedom? See gay marriage solution, above.
Just as the benificence of a capitalist republic allows the dhimocrats to flourish and threaten, so to will the inherent liberalistic policies allow the Islamists to tighten the noose.

Fascist (National Socialist Party) Aryan and Iranian were not that far apart. (that's why the Iranians changed their name from Persian) If you go far enough left wing you...

The muslim students shoutdown of Ambassador Oren was seconded by the Lame Response by UCI Chancellor Drake who responded with a letter that essentially whipped the malcreants with that awful tool of the enlightened and progressive element among us: The teachable moment. Yep. And the teachable moment informs us that, somehow, we are all victims and all perpetrators. And that umbrella covers all the generous donors who fund the institution Chancellor Drake protects and serves.

Fear is the only reason why there is a catering to islam. Islamists are willing to kill you for their interpretation of offending their culture, religion or rules of Sharia. They are nothing more than a large tribe of barbaric savages driven by simple-minded dogma. They are incompatible with civilized society.

To stand up for our freedoms, we all must ignore their pitiful, selfish demands that they be accommodated. Their presence in a civilized country can not be tolerated. They are deadly enemies of all who don't believe in their islam, and no laws, or rules of human decency, can alter their zealous, murderous behavior.

They are the scourge of mankind.

I read that Sharia Law allows: honor killings, and the right (if not the duty) to convert at the point of a sword those of other religions, Jews being the most salient targets. If those of another religion DO submit, they must become second-class citizens, and pay "tribute" to Muslims. In America, this would be equivalent to a "Twilight Zone" episode.

Is it possible that if those who chose to systematically disrupt a legitimate speech were charged with disruptive behavior or creating a public nuisance (as opposed to assembling peaceably), then given some time behind bars to reconsider their options along with an appropriate fine (is it worth $100 to pull such a juvenile stunt), some might prefer not to spend time in jail, perhaps...

We have freedom of speech, but only in specific zones, decided by the government. And usually behind barriers such as some type of caging with razor wire on top.

The jokes on us.

America as it was is gone it was a great country for a while. But the freedom that we enjoyed is over with, might as well get used to it. Its getting so a person is afraid to speak what if you say black opps that's a nono. Gay another slap in the face. Can't say God, or Jesus, but it is ok to say alluah, buddiah or any other anti christian word.
At one time a person could say "good God, we had a gay ole time last night but it was dark as hell." How many people did that offend? And don't ever mention allah in a negitative way.

As Muslims continue to pour into the West, bringing Islam, Sharia, male supremacy and jihad with them, along with their arrogant intolerance of any "insult" to Islam, the West has to make a choice. Before it does it would be wise to study Islam and its horror show history and see how deep the rabbit hole goes, after which it should know there's no choice but to resist Islamic incursions. Study it all online free with the Historyscoper and arm your mind with the key facts and knowledge at http://go.to/islamhistory

Read our founding documents.

Our rights come from God. If we give up God, we give up our rights by putting them into the hands of corruptible judges.

is a god, little g. He's the god of this world, also known as the devil. I slam is a perverted religion. There is only one true God and
he is Jehovah. He is three persons in one. God the Father, God the Son, Jesus, and God the Holy Spirit. Satan, alleh, mo ham ed, budda, etc. are the enemies of the true God and therefore my enemies. I intentionally did the misspelling. I like it that way.

was a pig and now he's dead.

Americans' rights should be taken from them to the extent they allow it. Those who will not hold on to their possessions, do not deserve them.

There never was, is not now, and never will be a time when people will be left alone. They will forever be targeted by dictators, tyrants, despots, criminals and bullies, particularly those in elective office dressed in tailor made suits and speaking eloquently.

There is a reason in nature for this. Stupid, lazy, fat, lard filed moronic dumbphucks are a menace to the universe and put everyone in peril. To allow them to walk around free so that they consume valuable resources and endanger others is unwise. Mother Nature, therefore, kills them or puts them under the control of...

2) hate the US and freedom of expression and speech as much as any commie commissar. If any sector of the US identifies with our Islamic enemies, it is academics. The most coddled and sheltered of people who would wet themselves if really required to defend anything physically.

Why do you think Little O's FCC chair is babbling about having the power to reg. the web (us) and he has another *czar* who believes in the *Fairness Doctrine* (also the *diversity* doctrine) and has an education *safety* czar who promotes pornography and pedophilia, who is sending lit. to pub. schools to help very young children call themselves Obama supporters who will do their very best to help the pres. (inform on their parents?)? Because he is scared...

Bill Maher's "Politically Incorrect" was correct in name only.

Maher carefully pick his targets.

He was careful to bash whites but never blacks.

He was constant in his criticism of Christianity and Islam but never said a cross word about Judaism.

Interesting since he was (is) half Christian/half Jewish.

I was actually with May most of the way through this article. He is right that attempts to inhinot speech are deplorable, and that governments should not be limiting speech. He is, of course, also right that Western governments are much better in this regard than governments in the Middle East other than Israel. That is more than May is usually right.

But in trying to portray this as a different in kind rather than a difference in degree, he insults the intelligence of his audience. The European laws that have allowed prosecution of anti-Islamic bigots began as laws allowing prosecution of holocaust deniers. May does not seem bothered by that limit on free speech although it predates the instances that he talks about. ...

An example of projection behavior;

"A thinking person would not recklessly castigate an entire Faith? Yet, after 9 years, no one on the Right, has adopted the proper perspective. "

Comment: Killer, lift your head up. get some fresh air, the "right " has recognized what is happening and is trying to address the issue.

Far left loons, that would include you, are doing their best to call this issue something other than what it really is. The truth is killer, you would be on a prayer rug facing mecca in five minutes flat, if you thought they were winning.

People like you have no moral convictions, perspective of history, or are capable of comprehending reality. This is one of your more sane posts, and it is a...

It is better to die while remaining pure than to remain living while offending others.

Truly progressive minds realize that Muslims are at odds with the West simply because they see us as being intolerant of their ways. We refuse to adopt the principles of Sharia in our laws, we allow people to speak against their religion, we oppose their attitudes about gays and women, and we refuse to recognize that government should be controlled by those in religious power.

We shun these ways simply because they are foreign to us. We need to release our inner prejudices and learn to embrace the ideas held by others, and adopt them in cases where eschewing them only results in offending the other party. The narrow minded will reject...

I am surprised by your article? It would appear that age is no accommodation of "Wisdom"! A thinking person would not recklessly castigate an entire Faith? Yet, after 9 years, no one on the Right, has adopted the proper perspective. That includes you, sir! America is not fighting against "Islam"! But, America is fighting against a group of people, who practice "Islam"! In the last half of the 20th century, "Black Muslims" were considered "Threats" to our society and way of life. The truth, if told, reflects "Police Brutality" and not Revolution. I suspect, more papers are sold and more "Idiots" are on and watching the news. People, like you, know everything once it happens. I didn't read anything prescient on 9-10-01?

...it was going to be easy. We reap now the harvest of several decades of intellectual treason, during which a cuplla generations have been taught in universities and even schools that war is bad and peace and love are the answer. Most "intellectuals" and "artists" are haters of the west and in particular the US and Israel. And they dominate the media and the academe. As well as Hollywood. That's what makes Iran, Hamas, Saudi, Chávez, Putin, Hujin Tao and the rest of the gang, look good to them. They share the hatred of the west. And freedom. The people of the west have long ago forgotten how they got rich and free. And that, bar a small miracle, is going to spell the end of the era of Western Success and Freedom. May G-d have mercy on...

Those two words are the worst thing that has happened to this country. As we continue to become more PC we lose more and more freedoms. If you are offended by something someone says then you need to grow up or look at why it offends you. I get offend when liberals talk but that is more because stupidity offends me, but I don't cry about it.

In a word, it is cowardice that explains why men and women step aside for these invaders. As soon as we get enough cowardly attornies in the military so that soldiers and marines have to defer to their judgement (by radio, of course) we will cease to be able to defend ourselves. I use that term loosely, we are not really defending ourselves, are we? A lot of brave men die on our behalf, and if Desert Storm was any indication, it hurts the same to lose a daughter as a son.

This brand of trouble started when the West tolerated the fatwa against Salman Rushdie for his Satanic Verses back in 1989. Why would Islamists stop pursuing the death or silencing of infidel writers and speakers after that? If you don't crack down hard, crap doesn't stop.

All of our Presidents have been soft on Islamic Totalitarianism, including Bush. Bush wasn't somehow better than the others. He was just as oblivious. We need a President who understands that the problem is an ideological movement that has broad support within Islam proper such that it cannot be separated from Muslim populations, Iran is the embodiment and fountainhead of this movement, and terrorism and the war against the West will never end as long as the...

someday i will not be able to say that allah is lucifer and mohammed is his stooge?