When President Obama's budget came out in February, with the greatest expansion of federal spending in American history, some sycophantic media outlets like The Washington Post ridiculously tried to sell the concept that Obama was pushing "deep cuts." It was a publicity line that collapsed on itself within 24 hours.
The Democrats are doing nothing to rein in the spending that is leading America into bankruptcy. What the Republican leadership is proposing, with its minuscule cuts, is next to nothing.
Freshman Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky is about the only one trying to be serious, and for that he will be massacred, if the media have their way. On the Feb. 23 broadcast of ABC's "Nightline," they actually cartooned him as a crazed maniac with a chain saw. It was presented as "news," but it had all the markings of a negative ad cooked up in the video lab at the DNC.
Over this over-the-top animation, ABC's Bill Weir spun like a top: "So, while the president argues for a budget scalpel (Obama looking reasonable, holding a scalpel), Rand Paul would use a chain saw, shutting down the departments of Energy and Education. He would kill the Consumer Product Safety Commission, shrink the Pentagon and cut off all foreign aid."
When Obama's budget arrived, ABC's own reporter Jake Tapper calmly noted the Obama budget blueprint proposed adding a whopping $7 trillion to the national debt over 10 years. But his colleague Weir apparently missed that company memo. He still thinks adding $7 trillion to the debt constitutes a "cut."
Paul has proposed $500 billion in cuts. That is less than a third of the projected deficit. To the leftist media, this constitutes taking out a chain saw. To the objective observer, it constitutes a start.
Maybe ABC just likes hyperbole. So, when Obama went on a massive "stimulus"-enhanced spending spree, did ABC offer us cartoon graphics of a crazed Obama maniacally burning down a bonfire of tax dollars?
ABC is trashing Paul for addressing what anyone who's looked at a national debt graph can see: You can't put a dent in the deficit with microscopic cuts like $61 billion in a $3.7 trillion budget. We're staring at a projected (SET ITAL) $1.65 trillion (END ITAL) deficit this year, the largest dollar number in American history. Why isn't that number taken seriously by our alleged government watchdogs in the press?
Whether one likes Paul's list of cuts or not, the fact remains that we are still left with a wholly irresponsible $1 trillion deficit. The current House Republican proposal is meaningless. Even before it's mangled by Democrats, it would reduce the budget by less than 2 percent and the deficit estimate by less than 4 percent.