Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, February 04, 2009
Tony Blankley :: Townhall.com Columnist
Obama's Defense Budget Mystery
by Tony Blankley
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


There has been some confusing reporting in the past few days regarding President Barack Obama's plans for the Defense Department budget. Officially, the Office of Management and Budget is claiming that it will increase the budget by 8 percent. But because most of the Iraq and Afghanistan war costs have been funded through supplemental appropriations rather than the regular department budget, total military funding remains a mystery. Mark me down as suspicious. I have been told by sources at the Pentagon that they have been told not to expect full funding of all existing programs. And there is evidence that Obama has been planning to force cuts on our military for some time.

According to The Boston Globe on Nov. 10, 2008, the need for budget cuts at the Pentagon (prepared last year by a Defense Department advisory committee that proposed possible program cuts on the assumption that the DOD would not be appropriated enough money to cover all current defense programs and weapon systems) was the enthusiastic subject of an Obama transition group study back in October:

"'Business as usual is no longer an option,' according to one of the internal briefings prepared in late October for the presidential transition, copies of which were provided to the Globe. 'The current and future fiscal environments facing the department demand bold action.'"

However, Obama gave no hint of these plans (if he has them) during the campaign. At the time, I preserved the Obama-Biden campaign Web site pages on defense policies just in case the day would come when Obama started to cut the defense budget. Here (in part, but it goes on for pages like this) is what Obama's Web site promised during the campaign:

"A Military Under Strain: Currently, our soldiers, seamen, airmen and Marines are deployed around the globe, working valiantly to defend our nation. Yet, these heroes are under-resourced and asked to do too much by a policy that has too often taken their sacrifice for granted. Due to their incredible courage and ingenuity, they persevere, but at incredible cost to themselves and their families.

"Recruitment and Retention Problems: A country of 300 million strong should not struggle to find enough qualified citizens to serve. Recruiting and retention problems have been swept under the rug by an administration that does not understand the value of service to our nation.

"A System Not Serving our Troops as Well as They Serve Us: As the shameful events at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and the recent reports on growing numbers of homeless and unemployed veterans show, we simply are not taking proper care of our wounded warriors and veterans.

"Fully Equip Our Troops for the Missions They Face: Barack Obama and Joe Biden believe we must get vitally needed equipment to our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines before lives are lost. We cannot repeat such failures as the delays in deployment of armored vehicles, body armor and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles that save lives on the frontlines.

"In this Section

"--Invest in a 21st Century Military

"--Build Defense Capabilities for the 21st Century

"--Restore the Readiness of the National Guard and Reserves Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Tony Blankley served as press secretary to then Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Newt Gingrich. Tony Blankley is the author of The West's Last Chance: Will We Win the Clash of Civilizations? .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Tony Blankley's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Deja Vu
Yep, Obama wants to put us right back where Clinton left us - virtually no defense!(What else could you expect from a draft-dodger?) We are going to be like sitting ducks to all those that "want to do us harm", to quote George 43. At least during the Bush Administration no one tried to harm us. At least our goverment kept us safe during those 8 years. Not so, or so it sounds like, is going to happen during the Obama administration. Also those Dem-wits - remember how many of them voted not to fund the military. (Shoot, they are too dumb to even pay their back taxes - duh.) What were those dem-wits thinking?? Lets just send our troops out to fight a war with just sticks and stones?
What if we had to go to war with China (God forbid!)and we had no military left to protect us? That could become a reality. Oh, the audacity of Obama and his crooked dem-wits!!



Is WW3 the object?
Obama wants to disband our military and depend on civil militia for national defense.
http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2008/02/27/obama-plans-to-dis arm-america/

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=69784

What will Happen when America is too weak to come to the aid of an Ally in need?
~~~~~~~~~
Every time America has reduced our military might in the past and allowed our weapons to become obsolete, we have been attacked by an aggressor Nation.
Americans entered WW1 with few troops, armed with French and English weapons.
They fought and died bravely to buy time for American factories to develop and manufacture modern weapons.
Recruits were trained with wooden toy guns, trucks with signs on them, "TANK", stovepipe & orange crates for field pieces.
With properly trained troops armed with modern weapons our army was quickly victorious.

WW2 found us in the same condition again. Too few men fighting holding actions with antique weapons.
Again, they fought and died bravely to buy time for our factories to equip and produce modern weapons and men to be trained to use them.
Again as in WW1, the war turned in America's favor as soon as we had properly armed & trained troops.

Weapons of war are more deadly today and war moves much faster.
How many of America's sons, brothers, fathers & uncles can we afford to spend to buy time?
Should we repeat the same mistakes that caused us to be forced into past wars?
Or would it be wiser to remain strong to discourage attack?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.