Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, April 11, 2008
Oliver North :: Townhall.com Columnist
Heroes and Horoscopes
by Oliver North
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



WASHINGTON -- Five years ago this week, American soldiers and Marines liberated Baghdad from Saddam Hussein's Republican Guard and the foreign fedayeen who had flooded into the despot's capital. For those of us who were there, it was an unforgettable event. But as Ambassador Ryan Crocker so cogently noted this week while he and Gen. David Petraeus were testifying before Congress, "The euphoria of that moment evaporated long ago." The assembled lawmakers, perched on their raised daises, barely noted the anniversary -- while subjecting the warrior and the diplomat to a 16-hour spectacle. For the general and the ambassador, it had to be an excruciating exercise in patience and bladder control.

The hearings -- two in the Senate and two more in the House -- all were choreographed carefully to give maximum exposure to the potentates on the Potomac. The masters of the mainstream media all were gathered. Professional protesters were present. The solons, all carefully prepared by their staffs, made their little speeches and then shamelessly angled for the best "gotcha" question to win the sound bite sweepstakes -- and the honor of being replayed repeatedly on the news and entertainment channels. Like so many of these hearings, it was a bit like Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey's "Greatest Show on Earth" -- without a ringmaster. I know -- as they say -- I've "been there, done that."

Sadly, the attending members of Congress evinced little interest in hearing from a decorated general fighting a bloody military campaign or a skillful U.S. ambassador trying to help a democratically elected government survive against brutal foreign and internal foes. Rather, it seemed as if our elected representatives would have preferred hearing from soothsayers who could read palms and interpret horoscopes. That our Congress has sunk to such a level is a sad testament to the state of our political process.

One of the inquisitors demanded to know, "Is success truly almost at hand? Or is this, you know, a commitment without end?" Not satisfied with Petraeus' response that further troop reductions would be "conditions-based," the senator insisted on a "rough estimate." The general's no-nonsense reply: "It is just flat not responsible to try to put down a stake in the ground and say, 'This is when it will be.'"

When will it end? When will we be out? When can we take the money we're spending on the war and divert it to bailing out our constituent borrowers and lenders caught up in the subprime mortgage mess? Petraeus and Crocker came equipped with facts, maps, charts and progress reports, but for this crowd, they should have brought Ouija boards, tarot cards and a crystal ball.

In the long and bloody autumn of 1944, no congressional committee chairman challenged Dwight Eisenhower to set a "reasonable timetable for a change of mission and redeployment of our troops" from Europe. Nor did any member of Congress summon Adm. Chester Nimitz in the aftermath of the battle for Iwo Jima to answer inane questions, such as: "Can you give us any idea as to how long it will take" to defeat imperial Japan? Such timorous bleating would have been unthinkable then, and it should be today.

At the close of his remarks, Petraeus noted, "Nothing means more to those in harm's way than the knowledge that their country appreciates their sacrifices and those of their families." That sentiment may have been lacking on Capitol Hill, but it was abundantly evident at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue.

While Congress was berating the general and the ambassador, the commander in chief was honoring one of the more than 4,000 Americans who have made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq. In an Oval Office ceremony, President Bush presented the Medal of Honor -- our nation's highest award for valor -- to the parents of Petty Officer 2nd Class Michael A. Monsoor, a Navy SEAL. Mike -- as his fellow SEALs called him -- was killed Sept. 29, 2006, in Ramadi, Iraq, when he threw himself on top of an enemy grenade in order to spare the lives of his fellow SEALs.

His platoon commander, now a lieutenant commander with whom our Fox News team has been embedded, said of the 25-year-old hero, "He made an instantaneous decision to save our teammates." Though wounded by shrapnel in the explosion, one of those with him that terrible morning said of Monsoor's unhesitating action: "He never took his eyes off the grenade. His only movement was down toward it. He undoubtedly saved mine and the other SEALs' lives."

Monsoor is just the fourth member of our armed forces to be awarded the Medal of Honor since war was declared against us Sept. 11, 2001. Call your grandstanding members of Congress and ask whether they know the four names.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Oliver North is the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance and author of The Assassins .

Be the first to read Oliver North's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
trughes
What do you want from me? I hate NO PERSON.Hate is non-existent to me.I do hate the sin a person does,even my own sin.

I have lost track of what you want me to say.You have belittled me.You have called me a dog.You have ridiculed me.You have called me a con.You have called me a liar.Exactly what do you feel I owe you?


You hate Fox News.You hate Bush.You hate Cheney.You hate me.You have said all these things,except that you hate me.I just assumed that because of all the vile things you have called me and said to me.

I do not hate anyone or anything.I may not LOVE them,but I don't hate them.For some people and some things,I feel nothing. But not hatred !

I will NOT get into a questionaire with you.I do not owe you that.You will not like my answers and I will not like yours.Admit that.I may not even like your questions. You don't know me.I don't know you.Let's leave it at that. Please.


give me one reasonable response
and I will believe you are human.

I begged you to think about what I was saying.

You responded by saying I was a Philadelphia lawyer.

Reason requires a response. Not a dodge, not an accusation.

I even said, I slipped up. But I tried to explain how I had intended my statement and you ignored it.

Your responses has convinced me there is no reasoning with a con. Because they respond only to their beliefs. Just as dogs only respond to genetic signals and pre-conditioning. What do do you do with a dog that bites? Do you attempt to reason? No. That apparently is how we should deal with cons and religionists. Exactly.

You have personified my anger with cons. Eisenhower, I know you disavow him. He was of my fathers conservatism, willing to look at the world and make judgements as an individual with a brain. This current phenomena is an aberration of humanity. Only defending a failed president, only defending a failed hatred of Islam.

You claim to be innocent of hatred. How do you feel about the people born into an islamic country? Do you have love for them? As a Christian (I'm going out on a limb there) do you love terrorists? If you do I might give you some credit. But I somehow doubt you do. As I con you are taught to hate and fear.

What I hate is pre-programmed ignorance. I do hate Fox News. They are liars. We can love dogs but not a dog that bites, because his former owner hit him with a 2x4 when he was drunk. That dog I'm sorry is not worth our love.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.