Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Michael Gerson :: Townhall.com Columnist
One of Us
by Michael Gerson
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


But this has earned him some unexpected enthusiasm. In Louisiana, Jindal is the darling of evangelical and charismatic churches, where he often tells his conversion story. One Louisiana Republican official has commented, "People think of Bobby Jindal as one of us." Consider that a moment. In some of the most conservative Protestant communities, in one of the most conservative states in America, Piyush "Bobby" Jindal, a strong Catholic with parents from Punjab, is considered "one of us."

This is a large political achievement. It is also an indication of what has been called the "ecumenism of the trenches" -- the remarkable alliance between evangelicals and Catholics on moral issues such as abortion and family values against an aggressive secularism. Two or three hundred years ago, the Protestant/Catholic divide remained a source of violence. Two or three decades ago, many conservative Protestant churches questioned if Catholics were properly considered Christians. If Jindal runs for president in three or seven years, he will be widely viewed as an evangelical choice.

Ultimately, however, Jindal is a problem-solving wonk, fond of explaining 31-point policy plans (his state ethics reform proposal actually had 31 points). This can have disadvantages -- a lack of human connection and organizing vision. But this approach also has advantages. Jindal is a genuine policy innovator. "His reforms," says Yuval Levin of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, "are the only constructive thing Republicans are doing on health care anywhere."

And Jindal's resume, intellectual confidence and command of policy make him the anti-Palin. Fairly or unfairly, media and intellectual elites (including some conservative elites) regard Gov. Sarah Palin as the inhabitant of another cultural planet. Jindal, while also religious and conservative, speaks the language of the knowledge class and will not be easily caricatured or dismissed. To journalists, policy experts and Rhodes Scholars, Jindal is also "one of us."

At this point in the election cycle, no Republican can be considered more than the flavor of the month. But this is an appealing one.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Gerson writes a twice-weekly column for The Post on issues that include politics, global health, development, religion and foreign policy. Michael Gerson is the author of the book "Heroic Conservatism" and a contributor to Newsweek magazine.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Michael Gerson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Jindal vs Jindal
Hannity carrying the water for Jindal yesterday was pathetic.

The challenge for Republicans will always be that they are not able to speak to reality and own their choices and actions when called upon.

Jindal does an excellent job on radio and television interviews; I've watched many of them and very impressed with his message and style. Tuesday night was not one of those opportunities.

Whether Hannity or others like it, HOW a message is conveyed is very important because you're SELLING the message.

Reagan, Clinton, Kennedy, Hitler and others were all charismatic speakers, not always because of substance but because they were able to charismatically call upon the crowd to join them in their message and pursuit.

If a person were to stand up and start screaming his message, we wouldn't listen, we'd tell ourselves and others, "yes, he might have something to say, but how he conveyed the message was lost". So, too, was Jindal. He didn't convey the message in a way that sold it.

It has nothing to do with BO's ability to give a speech. Invoking BO's "talent" is to elevate him only to victimize Jindal and others. BO gives good speech, so what? There are lots of people who give good speech. BO is not the god of such; others place him there, but that doesn't credential him in any way, it's just observation that people agree; not all people. It's subjective.

If the Republicans are going to do anything in 2010 and beyond they must speak to reality when situations arise by which correction needs to made - that can only be done if you are willing to look at what has occurred, honestly.

You can't know where you're going if you don't know what it is you're doing.

Why are we eating our own
I live in Louisiana. When Katrina hit it was Bobby Jindal that was getting things done. He was a Congressman at the time. While the Democratic Govenor (Blanco) was over her head and more concerned about how she looked than the state Bobby Jindal was in the trenches getting help and aid to not only people in his district but all over South Louisiana. Yes he is a policy wonk. He knows all the ins and outs of all the agencies. It is because of that he has been outstanding at every job he has held.

A lot of the responses on this site reek of racism. He was born in Louisiana. He IS a US Citizen by birth. He has done more for this state in one year than most Govenors accomplish in two terms. He has had to make some difficult choices in the recent weeks to trim the state budget. Do you realise that the Unemployment part of the Stim package requires a permanent change in state law? That it pays unemployment to part time jobs? It would cost tax payers through unemployment compensation payroll taxes and reduced wages? We are just starting to get a Industry friendly atmosphere in this state.

I admit he botched the response. I believe it was because he was over rehearsed. Did any of you nay sayers see him on Meet the Press? He could eat Obama for lunch in a Debate. Bobby is best off the cuff and off the teleprompter.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.