Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, July 11, 2008
Michael Gerson :: Townhall.com Columnist
"Wall-E" and Adam Smith
by Michael Gerson
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


WASHINGTON -- For a children's movie, "WALL-E" begins with startling bleakness: epic landscapes of the Earth buried under the waste of endless human wants. This is the way the world ends -- not with a nuclear bang, but with a closeout sale at "Buy n Large," a cinematic hybrid of Target and totalitarianism. Humanity's only monument the mega-mall and mountains of discarded rubbish.

One wonders what a 6-year-old on a summer afternoon makes of this post-consumer apocalypse. But this grim grandeur serves the cinematic purpose of highlighting a humble flicker of revolt -- a lonely robot named WALL-E, pointlessly compressing garbage into neatly stacked cubes. During these excavations, he salvages shiny items -- Christmas lights, Rubik's Cubes, cigarette lighters -- that become (like the random collections made by children) evidence of personality, even humanity. WALL-E spends his free time endlessly watching a videotape of "Hello, Dolly!" -- a tinny, grainy remnant of romance and beauty in a world devoid of both.

Humans have long since evacuated Earth to join an endless pleasure cruise in space. A wall featuring pictures of previous ship's captains chronicles 700 years of evolutionary regression -- from bold space explorers to rotund, adult infants, incapable of walking without aid. Humans move about the space liner in floating easy chairs, consume food in oversized shakes and engage in constant, Facebook-like communication while communicating little but complaint and boredom.

Though WALL-E says only a few words in the movie, his compassion, vulnerability and endearing clumsiness awaken the dormant humanity of everyone he meets, robot and human. Making this believable is a serious cinematic achievement, combining the emotional intensity of silent movies with the remarkable vistas of science fiction.

But there is a deeper purpose to "WALL-E." Without revealing too much of the plot, the spell of self-involved consumption is eventually broken by a combination of music, natural beauty, holding hands and dancing (the space ballet of WALL-E and his lethal love interest is elegant and memorable). Unlike some horror movies, this "alien" spreads a contagion of humanism. Unlike the pessimistic visions of "Westworld" or "2001: A Space Odyssey," the robots revolt in favor of humanity.

Some conservatives have dismissed "WALL-E" as a crude critique of business and capitalism. This is only true if capitalism is identical to boundless consumerism -- a conviction that Adam Smith did not seem to share. Smith argued that human flourishing requires "good temper and moderation." Self-command and the prudent use of freedom are central to his moral theory. And these are precisely the virtues celebrated in "WALL-E." The end credits -- worth staying to see -- are a beautiful tribute to art and work, craft and cultivation.

"WALL-E" is partly an environmental parable, but its primary point is moral. The movie argues that human beings, aided by technology, can become imprisoned by their consumption. The pursuit of the latest style leads to conformity. The pursuit of pleasure displaces the deeper enjoyments of affection and friendship. The pursuit of our rhinestone desires manages to obscure our view of the stars.

If the mega-mall is the symbol of decadence in "WALL-E," the symbol of renewal is the musical "Hello, Dolly!" And it is not so strange a choice. The musical is the great, underestimated American art form, likely to last for centuries. Particularly in their golden age, Broadway musicals epitomized a belief in the triumph of love, hope and choreography. "WALL-E" manages to reconstruct an entire world in the moral image of the musical -- passing along its cultural relics of tenderness, emotional longing and grace. It is a tribute to "WALL-E" -- and to the geniuses at Pixar who made it -- that this movie, in some distant and desperate future, could serve the same cultural purpose.

What is perhaps most surprising about "WALL-E" is its daring. Not the false daring that transgresses lines of brutality or taste. Rather, the daring of savagely lampooning people in padded lounge chairs consuming supersized drinks -- who suspiciously resemble audience members (including me) in a luxury theater. The daring of attacking a culture of consumption that will determine whether "WALL-E" is a commercial success or failure.

And beyond these thoughtful paradoxes, this animated, summer movie dares to raise a principle central to our humanity. People -- children and others -- require constant reminding they are more than the sum of their wants. And in this task, a little robot will lead them.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Gerson writes a twice-weekly column for The Post on issues that include politics, global health, development, religion and foreign policy. Michael Gerson is the author of the book "Heroic Conservatism" and a contributor to Newsweek magazine.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Michael Gerson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Capitalism and the human good


Mr. Gerson writes: "Some conservatives have dismissed "WALL-E" as a crude critique of business and capitalism. This is only true if capitalism is identical to boundless consumerism--
a conviction that Adam Smith did not seem to share. Smith argued that human flourishing requires "good temper and moderation." Self-command and the prudent use of freedom are central to his moral theory."

Mr. Gerson is correct about Adam Smith's theory; Smith was a typical 18thcentury Enlightenment moral theorist. However, what's at issue is capitalism as an existing economic system, and "boundless consumerism" seems to me an accurate description of what we've actually got. Smith, unlke today's libertarians, did not attempt to derive his moral theory from his understanding of the economy. Rather, his moral theory and his understanding of the economy stem from his thinking as a moral philosopher trying to understand the emerging economy and society of his day.,

The realistic way to look at American capitalism is that the guy with the most toys wins. Demand for anything--violent video games, the sexualization of young children, porn, and so much more, generates a supply, as the free market responds to what consumers want. That's what needs criticizing.

Boring?
Nice post, Steve. The fact that A Reader in California dismisses WALL-E as "boring" says a lot about A Reader in California. The film DOESN'T provide big bangs and instant gratification from the get-go. Instead, it quietly and hauntingly unfurls, mesmerizing the audience in a way I've seldom seen on the big screen. It's truly a visual wonder, with a meaningful story that unfolds slowly but powerfully. You're not exaggerating as much as you think by comparing the movie to Mozart or Dostoevsky. Many reviewers have used the word "masterpiece" to describe WALL-E, and I think that's apt.

The movie may be a little mature for young children (though my seven-year-old has now seen it three times and absolutely adores it.) But any adult who finds this film "boring" is, indeed, most likely the type of person implicated therein.

Normally, I'd agree with Uncle Max that we should ignore all the "what it means" talk and just enjoy a sweet film, but the "meaning" is so refreshing compared to what Hollywood normally dishes out, I think it merits our attention.

http://www.lcweekly.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=v iew&id=647&Itemid=1&ed=20
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.