Flush with power from victory, his ego puffed by an adoring press and buoyed by a celebrity hype machine, President Barack Obama has taken to caricaturizing his opponents as malevolent enemies of the good. The good, of course, would be the president and his agenda.

One major enemy would be radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh. In a January interview with Sean Hannity, and on episodes of his own show, Limbaugh has asserted that he wants Obama to fail. The liberal-media demagogues who promptly pounced on these remarks missed what Rush was really saying, as usual.

Here are some choice words: "If I wanted Obama to succeed, I'd be happy the Republicans have laid down. And I would be encouraging Republicans to lay down and support him. Look, what he's talking about is the absorption of as much of the private sector by the U.S. government as possible, from the banking business to the mortgage industry, the automobile business to health care. I do not want the government in charge of all of these things. I don't want this to work."

Limbaugh received heavy fire for his remarks. But what's wrong with them? To say anything else would have been a surrender and capitulation of the ideas he's spent the last 20 years of his life articulating and defending.

No one should be forced to throw out their principles just because they disagree with a popular president. Limbaugh and all happy warriors must continue to work hard advocating for their beliefs, no matter how fierce the tide is against them. As Limbaugh explained on his show, "Why is it any different, what's new, what is unfair about my saying I hope liberalism fails? Liberalism is our problem."

But it wasn't just Limbaugh the lightning rod that so angered the ascendant left. Two weeks into the Obama administration, reporters from Politico sat down with former vice president Dick Cheney. "Cheney warns of new attacks," the headline read, causing many Obama fans to condemn the man as a virulent scaremonger. Again, self-righteous fury has clouded the left's vision, blinding it to the values of context. Continued...