Then there's this idea that FDR rode to the rescue, saving the day by
untying the American people from the railroad tracks of runaway capitalism.
Former Clinton Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, now a surrogate for
Barack Obama, recently said on NPR: "It's very tempting to always think that
the government should just stand back and let the private sector sort these
problems out. That's the kind of thinking that made the Depression ŒGreat.'"
Summers should know better (in fact, I'm sure he does). The Great Depression
was not made "Great" by government inaction. Indeed, FDR's New Deal may have
been wonderful in some mytho-poetic sense, and maybe some of its reforms can
be defended in some broader context, but as an effort to end the Great
Depression, the New Deal was a failure. As my colleague Mark Steyn writes,
"Lots of other places - from Britain to Australia - took a hit in 1929 but,
alas, they lacked an FDR to keep it going till the end of the Thirties.
That's why in other countries they refer to it as "the Depression," but only
in the U.S. is it 'Great.'"
Today we're hearing a similar argument about John McCain or, more often, his
evil henchman, former Sen. Phil Gramm as Herbert Hoover's mini-me.
"Phil Gramm, one of the architects of the deregulation in Washington that
led directly to this mess on Wall Street, is also the architect of John
McCain's economic plan," Obama said recently. A couple problems: Gramm is no
longer with the McCain campaign. More important: This is nonsense on stilts.
The deregulation that the Obama camp most often cites is the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which passed the Senate in 1999 by a 90-8 margin and
was signed enthusiastically by Bill Clinton. Thirty-eight Democrats voted
for it, including Chuck Schumer, John Kerry, Chris Dodd, John Edwards, Dick
Durbin, Tom Daschle and Barack Obama's running mate, Joe Biden. The "Leach"
in the legislation's title was a founder of Republicans for Obama.
Moreover, nothing in that law has much to do with today's financial
meltdown. Indeed, it has helped some financial institutions weather the
storm precisely because they are more diversified.
Also, who are the real Hoovers here? Obama is sympathetic to protectionism,
as is his party. He says he will raise taxes on the top income earners, and
if he's remotely honest about his spending ambitions, he will have to raise
taxes on everybody else as well.
Meanwhile, who sought to intervene when Fannie Mae metastasized? John
McCain. Who wanted to keep the party going? The party of Roosevelt. There's
blame all around, but nothing today supports the liberal ghost stories of
yesterday. |