Talk About Platner’s Other Perversions and Creepiness; Leave His VA Stuff Out of...
Look Who's Surging in Alabama's Senate Race
The Free Press: 'Graham Platner's Ex-Girlfriend Wants to Set the Record Straight'
Skid Row: Uh, We Got Paid By Dems to Vote for Their People
Here's the Man Roy Cooper Refused to Lock Up
CBS News' Editor-in-Chief's Next Assignment Will Certainly Cause Libs to Melt Down
ICE Raids Are Coming to This Major City Soon
When Leadership Loses Its Moral Compass
Our Informational World Is Getting Smaller
Spencer Pratt Responds to His Crushing Defeat in LA With a Mysterious Image
A New Age of Warfare: Downed Apache Pilots Rescued by Sea Drone
After Months of Refusal Gavin Newsom Officially Endorses Xavier Becerra For CA Governor
Kristen Welker Insults President Trump With 'No Evidence' Guff
Man Who Murdered Ukrainian Woman on Charlotte Light Rail Ruled Incompetent to Stand...
More Money Won’t Fix Our Schools. Mississippi Data Proves It.
Tipsheet

Just the Facts, Please

Just the Facts, Please
Judge Sotomayor's 60% reversal rate by the Supreme Court is remarkable.  In other words, more than half of the times that she wrote a majority opinion that went to the Supremes on appeal, the highest court in the land said she had gotten it wrong.
Advertisement


There are only two reasons that a judge gets reversed that much.  Either s/he doesn't understand the law, or else refuses to apply it correctly.  It's hard to believe that Judge Sotomayor truly couldn't figure out the law in each of these cases.  Instead, her high reversal rate suggests a willingness-- like that manifested by the oft-reversed Ninth Circuit -- to use the law as an instrument to make policy.

It's worth pointing out that, as a justice, she'll have the chance to do successfully what she apparently tried to do before -- make law from the bench.  There is nothing to constrain a Supreme Court justice in his or her work but an internal commitment to upholding the rule of law -- which means (among other things) pledging impartiality toward litigants, and realizing that the work of judges (even those on the Supreme Court) is supposed to be to interpret the law as it is written, not to rewrite it so as to make it more to their personal liking.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement