Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Janice Shaw Crouse :: Townhall.com Columnist
WRAP Up Porn and Throw It Out
by Janice Shaw Crouse
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

In the days before automatic garbage disposals in kitchen sinks, good housewives would wrap up the household garbage and throw it away. Harkening back to those “good ‘ole days,” several organizations joined together in 1987 with Norma Norris, a woman who was determined to get rid of pornography by raising awareness of the numerous ways that pornography hurts people and harms communities. Thus, the annual White Ribbons Against Pornography (WRAP) campaign was launched — with dozens of organizations, including Concerned Women for America — urging supporters to wear and/or display a white ribbon indicating their opposition to pornography during WRAP week, October 26 — November 2.

Since 1987, the problem of porn has become infinitely greater — from less than 80,000 Internet porn sites in 1998 to nearly 1.5 million in 2003 — because the Internet has brought that evil right into our homes and bombarded even our children with obscene language and images. There are nearly 35 million visits to porn sites every month — some experts estimate that constitutes 1-in-4 Internet users.

Since 1987, in spite of the feminist movement that was supposed to keep women from being mere sex objects, women have increasingly been depicted in degrading and debased ways. Now, with the demand for younger and younger images, the harm has spread to children. Further, the exploding pornography industry — producing more than 15,000 new adult industry titles every year — has increased the demand for women and children photographed and filmed in sexualized situations far beyond what anyone could have imagined 20 years ago when the WRAP campaign started.

The naïve argue that what someone does in private is nobody else’s concern. Research shows, however, that pornography and obscenity are very much everyone’s concern. Pornography has become a multi-billion dollar industry — $5 billion annually — that victimizes both those who are involved in its production as well as those who consume the products. We have documented evidence today that pornography affects us all; it harms its users and the impact spreads to all who are connected with those individuals: the wives or husbands, boyfriends or girlfriends, and the whole family. We should be especially concerned about the nation’s children. The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children reports that they receive more than 1,000 complaints annually about online obscenity affecting children.

For some people, magazines like Playboy, Hustler or the free online adult pornography sites serve as a gateway to more graphic and perverted images. For certain ones, an addiction to violent and sadistic images is linked to sexual assault. The Federal Bureau of Prisons issued a study last year reporting that 85 percent of prisoners convicted of possessing child pornography admitted to abusing at least one child.

The ill-informed argue that they have a First Amendment right to view pornography, but nothing could be further from the truth. Our free speech rights do not extend to pornography, which, if allowed, would give one person the “right” to abuse and debase another person. The Supreme Court ruled in 1973 that “obscene material” is not protected under the First Amendment. Thus, obscenity is illegal and has been since 1973. In 1996, an amendment strengthened the law so that using an interactive computer service to transmit obscene materials is prohibited. The problem is that State Prosecutors and United States Attorneys cannot prosecute unless violators of the obscenity laws are brought before them.

When cases are brought to trial, they are prosecuted successfully. The Supreme Court has been clear that there are “legitimate governmental interests” at stake in stemming the tide of obscene materials; such actions directly impact public safety, public morality, family life, and lead to a decent society. Pat Truman, former chief of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the U.S. Department of Justice, reports, “Nearly every obscenity case in the last 30 years has resulted in a conviction, so we need to increase dramatically the number of cases indicted.”

As citizens, we need to complain when we see violations of the obscenity laws. As concerned citizens, we need to ask state and local legislators to act responsibly regarding sexually-oriented businesses; they end up costing the community in numerous ways that harm citizens far beyond the real money expended in policing and regulating. As the saying goes, “If you do nothing in the face of evil, evil prevails.”

But we need to do much more than exercise our citizen responsibilities. We face an apathetic and ill-informed public, so one of our most immediate challenges is changing society so that cultural influences will curtail the demand for pornography. The public needs to become aware of the terrible impact of pornography on individuals, families and communities. Our pastors need to preach about the “wages of sin” regarding objectifying women and sexualizing children. Community leaders need to support the fight against pornography — far too many are “under the table” supporters of the up-front profit of sexually-oriented businesses without realizing the behind-the-scenes costs when criminal networks and unsavory characters invade the town.

Our re-education campaign must extend to changing public perceptions. While 75 percent of Americans support enforcing obscenity laws, we have become an amazingly accepting society that is virtually impossible to offend. Too many people shrug their shoulders and turn away as though offensive material and behavior are not their business. People are not outraged; instead, they accept images on their television screens and computer monitors that would have shocked previous generations and should shock ours.

It is said that the laws of a nation express the people’s conscience. Our national laws are clear regarding obscenity and pornography, but as a people we have stood by while the commercial sex industry has coarsened and corrupted our culture. The goal of WRAP Week is to refresh our commitment to rid our culture of these harmful influences. So, bring out the white ribbons, WRAP up the porn garbage, and get rid of it!

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Janice Shaw Crouse is a former speechwriter for George H. W. Bush and now political commentator for the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Janice Shaw Crouse's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Japan
Gerald:

The law was actually that images showing non-Japanese citizens were not considered a crime. I suppose they had a point to some degree as if the victims were not their citizens and the images were produced outside Japan did they have jurisdiction? But as you stated the US and various NGOs put pressure on Japan and Japan changed the law.

The US also has a law that will prosecute sex tourists for doing things that are a crime in the US even if these acts took place outside US soil against a non-US citizen. I find such a law very troubling. If the US can impose extra nationality laws on this subject, can it then expand it to other areas, like drug use in say Europe. Sets a dangerous precedent. If crimes are comitted in Thailand for example, the person should be extradited and prosecuted there, if the Thai authorities decide not to prosecute, well it is their country. The laws of the Imperial Federal Government should end at the water's edge.

great formula
Yun: "Either way, it looks like the chance of McCain outlive Obama is GRRRREAT!"

If the melanoma doesn't kill him soon.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.