Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, February 09, 2009
Bill Steigerwald :: Townhall.com Columnist
A Nation Immune to Global Warming Hysteria
by Bill Steigerwald
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



Perhaps there is hope for America after all.

Despite the incessant hysteria about how mankind's irresponsible use of fossil fuels has put our whole planet in imminent peril, few Americans seem to be sitting up late at night fretting over any global-warming apocalypse.

Statistical support for this premise came last month from a poll by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, which asked a random sample of 1,503 adults to rate 20 concerns -- jobs, Social Security, tax cuts, immigration, etc. -- as their "top priority" for 2009.

To the surprise of no one, a top concern -- chosen by 85 percent of those polled -- was the "economy," followed closely by "jobs" (82 percent) and "terrorism" (76 percent).

Way, way down at the very bottom of the list -- far below even "lobbyists" -- was "global warming." Only 30 percent considered it a top concern.

This is encouraging news for those who've lost faith in the collective intelligence or judgment of the American people.

It shows that many if not most Americans have either ignored or not been influenced much by the exaggerations, propaganda and lies that they've been subjected to since 1988 by global-warming alarmists like NASA's James Hansen and their press agents at The New York Times, The New Yorker, CBS, CNN, Time, et al.

No one in the elite mainstream media dares to dissent or laugh when Hansen says New York City will be under 50 feet of water 100 years from now or when Al Gore tells Congress, as he did last week for the 101st time since he sold his portfolio of Occidental Petroleum stock, that the planet soon will be uninhabitable for humans unless we switch to alternative energy sources. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Bill Steigerwald, born and raised in Pittsburgh, is a former L.A. Times copy editor and free-lancer who also worked as a docudrama researcher for CBS-TV in Hollywood before becoming a reporter for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and a columnist Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Bill Steigerwald recently retired from daily newspaper journalism..
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
reply to h2Oskier #4
I said nothing about oil industry scientists, pro or con, in my posts. And it is absolutely not the case that all scientists who believe in GW are working for the "government."

As for the earth having gone through periods of warming, etc., we GW supporters have no problem with accepting that--what most of us are saying is that for the civilization we have NOW, increases of mean global temperature beyond certain levels wouldn't be nice--except maybe for real estate speculators who'd like to see some beach front property at the foot of the Appalachians.

What, precisely, is so threatening about the possibility that (a) as part of various geophysical cycles, caused by various processes--some of which I mentioned-- that GW is occurring, and (b) some increment (to be specified by research) has something to do with human activity? Are conservatives really so wedded to the idea that NOTHING like this is possible, or that there is NO evidence for it?

As for the polar bears, perhaps you've heard of the recently discovered polar bear/grizzly bear hybrids, called grolars, probably better able to survive Arctic warming than polar bears can, an instance of evolution at work.

Of course, you conservatives won't like that explanation either.


"Climate change"
Is that catchy phrase equal to the Obama "change we can believe in"?

Begins to appear that both are propaganda with no substance. Well, except Al Gore is making millions selling his "carbon credits".

Did anyone notice that purchasing those credits really eliminates those emissions from our atmosphere?

Why can't I sell my carbon credits to someone just like Gore and associates? Are mine any less existent? More "figment of Al's imagination"?

The guy is fear monger with his "doom and gloom", just like Obama with his quickly lost "Hope and Change" rhetoric.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.