Yes, Democrats Are Even Anti-Nice Meals for Our Troops
CNN Is Striving to Sink Its Entire Credibility Within a Week, and Journos...
What Is Victory in Operation Epic Fury?
The State of American Conservation Is Strong at SCI Convention
Yeah, You Forgot About God
CNN Repeatedly Screws Up on Mamdani and Two Muslims With Bombs
Democrats Side With the Mullahs
Trump Is Right: The Save America Act Is Crucial
TrumpRx Is a Step Toward Making the Pharma Market Finally Work for America
We Don't Have to Live This Way
Michigan Synagogue Attacker Identified
Ex-MA City Official Allegedly Used City Funds for 153 Pounds of Steak Tips,...
Texas Man Sentenced to 7.5 Years in $59.9M Medicare Brace Scheme
Security Guards Hailed As Heroes After Stopping Attack at Michigan Synagogue Housing 140...
Trump DOJ Sues California Over EV Mandate
Tipsheet

Saying One Thing, Doing Another

Saying One Thing, Doing Another
According to this piece by Amir Taheri in The New York Post, Barack privately tried to prevail on the Iraqis to delay any agreement about withdrawing American troops
Advertisement
 -- even as he publicly called for that same withdrawal. 

The reason is obvious, isn't it?  After all, it's much more difficult to stoke widespread anger and discontent about our troops serving in Iraq if the successful end of that service is somehow in sight.  If troops can come home because the mission has worked, it also makes it much harder to argue that the surge failed -- as Barack had predicted.

Even so, it's revealing of his character that he'd try to demand a delay in troop withdrawal agreements for his own political benefit.  What's more, his latest proposed withdrawal date, 2010, would be impossible to meet if agreements were delayed as he requested.

But what does he care?  He'd be President by then . . . or not.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement