Can You Feel the Excitement? Kamala Is Back and in the Lead!
Resurrected Clip of Don Lemon Getting Owned by a Woman When Discussing Immigration...
Bad News: Abigail Spanberger Is Governor of Virginia. Good News: A Savior Might...
The AI Race Needs a Little More ‘I’ in It
A Republican Who Wants to Raise Taxes
Welcome to the Old World Order
The Midterms: It's Not About 'Affordability' -- It's About Trump Hatred
Trump’s First Year Delivered the Most Meaningful Education Reforms in Decades
Pro-Abortion James Talarico's Factless Campaign for the Senate
How America First Policies Can Lead to Even More Growth in 2026
If You Own It, You Should Be Able to Fix It
Minnesota Malfeasance Is a Preview of Biden-Era Fraud and Waste
Why Children Under 13 Should Be Banned From Social Media
A Refreshing Year for LGBT Conservatives
Jury Convicts Alleged Minneapolis Gang Member in Fatal Gas Station Attack
Tipsheet

Saying One Thing, Doing Another

According to this piece by Amir Taheri in The New York Post, Barack privately tried to prevail on the Iraqis to delay any agreement about withdrawing American troops
Advertisement
 -- even as he publicly called for that same withdrawal. 

The reason is obvious, isn't it?  After all, it's much more difficult to stoke widespread anger and discontent about our troops serving in Iraq if the successful end of that service is somehow in sight.  If troops can come home because the mission has worked, it also makes it much harder to argue that the surge failed -- as Barack had predicted.

Even so, it's revealing of his character that he'd try to demand a delay in troop withdrawal agreements for his own political benefit.  What's more, his latest proposed withdrawal date, 2010, would be impossible to meet if agreements were delayed as he requested.

But what does he care?  He'd be President by then . . . or not.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement