Who Is James Talarico?
Footage Shows Black Lives Matter Leader Literally Under Assault for Mishandling Donation M...
Iranian Regime Is About to Find Out Why Attacking Arab Nations Was a...
Father of Apalachee School Shooter Convicted of Second-Degree Murder
What the Hell Happened in Dallas County's Primary Election Last Night?
Nancy Mace Just Wholloped Tim Walz in a Hearing About Minnesota's Rampant Fraud
Whoopi Goldberg Is Left Speechless When Confronted With the Reality of Women in...
When It Comes to Operation Epic Fury, John Fetterman Is the Only Sane...
Another CBS News Producer Resigned, and Nothing of Value Was Lost
SCOTUS: Actually Parents Do Matter
Would SCOTUS Ruling on Marijuana Users' Gun Rights Help Hunter Biden?
Marco Rubio Fires Back at Critics of Operation Epic Fury: Let Me Explain...
The Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Victory on Immigration
Zohran Mamdani Joins CCP-Linked Organization for a Lunar New Year's Celebration
NATO Intercepts Iranian Missile Headed for Turkey
Tipsheet

Report: U.S. Navy Not Ready for War

Report: U.S. Navy Not Ready for War
AP Photo/Bullit Marquez, File

A new nonpartisan report conducted at the behest of key Republican leadership in Congress found that the U.S. Navy Surface Warfare is not prepared for war.

Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR), and Congressmen Mike Gallagher (WI), Jim Banks (IN), and Dan Crenshaw (TX) directed the review after events in recent years raised concerns about the Navy's performance.

Advertisement

The primary incidents that sparked this investigation were the U.S.S. Fitzgerald collision in 2017, the surrender of a small boat to Iran in the Persian Gulf, and the burning of the U.S.S. Bonhomme Richard.

Veterans of the Navy were interviewed about their experience in the service. When asked if the interviewees believed the incidents above were part of a broader problem in Navy leadership or culture, 94 responded "yes."

The most important problem raised by the report is an apparent insufficient focus on warfighting. 

"Perhaps the most concerning comment and consistent observation amongst interviewees was that the service does not promote or advance surface ship warfighting in a meaningful way," the report detailed. "Finding and sinking enemy fleets should be the principal purpose of a Navy. But many sailors found their leadership distracted, captive to bureaucratic excess, and rewarded for the successful execution of administrative functions rather than their skills as a warfighter."

Other issues include "a dominant and paralyzing zero-defect mentality," little investment in surface warfare officer training, poorly planned surface ship maintenance programs, micromanagement, and over-responsiveness to media culture.

Advertisement

One interviewee even had this to say: “Sometimes I think we care more about whether we have enough diversity officers than if we’ll survive a fight with the Chinese Navy.”

Tom Cotton released a statement on the report's findings, which he described as "very concerning."

"Our sailors are too often deprived of the training and leadership they need to fight and win at sea. A Navy that puts lethality, warfighting, and operational excellence at the heart of its culture is absolutely essential to our national security."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement