How My 2025 Predictions Went – and Some Predictions for 2026
While America Watched the Border, the Cyber Front Exploded
Let’s All Hope 2026 Brings Us Some Real ‘News’ Outlets
If Elected CA Governor, Eric Swalwell Vows to Weaponize Government Against ICE Agents
'Just Fine:' WI Governor Tony Evers Continues to Withhold SNAP Data From the...
With Islam on the Rise, Gay European Voters Shift to the Right
Yeah, Culture Does Matter
Obamacare Was, Is and Will Always Be a Problem
Oligarchies, Terrorism, Greed, and Other Obstacles to Forecasting the Future
Minnesota’s Fraud Is Blowing the Lid Off a Broken Election System
The Danger of Nick Fuentes' Ideology
Will the US Senate Stall Much-Needed Permitting Reforms?
Video of Woman Saying 'Fraud Is Bad' Fuels Scrutiny of Minnesota Childcare Program
Former Real Estate Professional Convicted in $2.4M Investor Fraud Scheme
New Media Shine While Legacy Media Die
Tipsheet
Premium

Kash Patel's Ouster at ATF Raises Questions

AP Photo/Ben Curtis

Kash Patel was wearing two hats. One was as FBI director, a role he was confirmed for by the Senate. The other was as acting ATF director. A lot of people saw this as a promising development.

While progress hadn't been what I might have liked to see out of the ATF, things were moving in the right direction... until Wednesday, when it was announced Patel was out.

Post continues:

...were shocked and confused, the two DoJ officials said, and no explanation for the change was given.  

The Justice Department did not respond to our request for comment.  Nor did a spokeswoman for Patel.  

Driscoll, who is 38 pr 39, is expected to continue in his job as Army Secretary.  Both roles are normally considered full time jobs.  

Sources say Patel had not been seen inside an ATF facility for weeks.

This raises some pretty serious questions.

One might be a question of if enough was happening at ATF to satisfy the Trump administration. If not, that might be grounds to remove Patel from his role, especially if his dual role was interfering with it.

Yet that doesn't make a lot of sense, considering Driscoll has a full-time job, too. What's more, instead of another job running another DOJ law enforcement agency, it's a role in a completely different part of the executive branch.

Some have speculated that the issue is really Patel's duties at the FBI turning out to be far more involved than originally suspected. Sure, the Trump administration had some familiarity with what happens at the FBI, but we've seen a massive influx of domestic violence since the president took office. It's possible that the move was simply to allow Patel to focus his attentions on ending that threat first and foremost, and Driscoll just happens to be the guy who has the time for whatever reason.

Honestly, the move is kind of baffling.

Patel stepping out isn't overly shocking. Sure, I had hopes that his running the ATF meant that they were ready to merge it with the FBI and end all the stupidity there, but there was always a chance that he really was just acting in that role for however long it was needed.

Yet I'd figured that if Patel was replaced, it would be with someone who would do the role full-time. I figured we'd get a nomination, a confirmation, and then a full-time head until/unless Congress decided to abolish the ATF entirely.

Replacing Patel with the Secretary of the Army is...odd.

Especially since his confirmation had little or no discussion of Second Amendment rights. Where does he stand on Trump's stated goal of restoring the gun rights of the American people?

He's not going to be as bad as former director Steve Dettelbach no matter what, I'm sure, but there are still big voids on what most of us know about his Second Amendment bonafides.

But those are questions for an entirely different story.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement