Here's Why Iran's Government Has Gotten Away With Tyranny
Trump Says He Is Concerned About the Midterm Elections
Her Baby's Bruise Sent This Mom to the Hospital. What Happened Next Shattered...
Don't Let Cea Weaver's Tears Fool You
Inside the Massachusetts Prison Where Women Live in Fear of 'Transgender' Inmates
Mamdani Voters Shrug at Venezuelan Immigrant's Warning Against Socialism
Guess Who Has Become a Propaganda Tool in Iran As the Regime Shuts...
Over a Dozen Oil Executives to Meet the President Trump As Venezuelan Oil...
'We Support Hamas Here,' Antisemitic Protest Erupts Outside Synagogue Near Jewish Day Scho...
The Gift of America and the Gift of Life
Automakers Eat Billion-Dollar Losses on Electric Vehicles
Texas AG Ken Paxton Shuts Down Taxpayer Funded 'Abortion Tourism'
$500K Stolen, 20 States Targeted: Detroit Man Admits Wire Fraud and Identity Theft
DHS to Surge 1,000 Additional Agents Into Minneapolis As Protests Escalate
Oklahoma Chiropractor Indicted in $30M Health Care Fraud and COVID Relief Theft Scheme
Tipsheet

'Un-American' Affirmative Action Slammed As Higher Ed's Racial Bias Faces SCOTUS

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

As the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Monday in two cases dealing with racial preferences used by elite universities for their admissions processes, conservatives praised the Court for taking the cases and called for an end to the  "affirmative action" — a feel-good term used to cover for the underlying use of racism to determines a student's value — policies that have harmed students for years.

Advertisement

For one example, Harvard's own admissions statistics show how the elite school's use of racial preferences has drastically warped the likelihood of acceptance for students of different races, giving priority to some at the expense of others in a way that erased merit as a standard for admission and stripped students of an equal opportunity to attend schools that use such standards.

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations and Governor of South Carolina Nikki Haley tweeted Monday as SCOTUS arguments were taking place that the practice of "[p]icking winners and losers based on race isn't just wrong, it's un-American," adding "liberal colleges didn't get that memo." No kidding. 

Republican Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas highlighted an earlier quote by Chief Justice John Roberts that made his thoughts on racial bias: "the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race. 

Advertisement

Related:

SUPREME COURT

Meanwhile Vivek Ramaswamy noted that the problems happening in college admissions aren't only a problem for students after their elementary and secondary educations are complete: 

In his commentary on the arguments in the University of North Carolina case, Ilya Shapiro concluded that "the time has come to end the decades-long tinkering with how much admissions officers are allowed to judge applicants based on the color of their skin rather than the content of their character and their academic merit." Shapiro also predicted that, "come June," when SCOTUS opinions are released, "the Court will help promote national unity and equal opportunity against the racialist balkanizers." 

Advertisement

Not for nothing, conservatives and others who oppose colleges and universities using racial preferences in their admissions criteria are in an overwhelming majority, according to a Washington Post poll conducted at the beginning of October as the Supreme Court's current term began. 

According to the Post's survey 63 percent of Americans said they support a SCOTUS opinion barring higher education institutions from considering students' race when making admission decisions. Notably, 67 percent of independents support such a ban on affirmative action in college admissions while 53 percent of Democrats think SCOTUS should allow racial bias to continue impacting admissions decisions. 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos