Senate GOP Has Made Their Decision on Whether They'll Nuke the Filibuster
This House GOP Rep Is Missing...and He Represents One of the Most Competitive...
A Reporter Asked This Question Regarding Iran...and It Set Trump Off
It's an Underreported Story, But Also a Glaring National Security Issue
From Death Row: ‘Thank You’ From Christian Brothers Facing Execution for Their Faith
Rich NY Writer Who Called Stealing a 'Political Protest' Melts Down When Confronted...
Teenage Girl Suffers Concussion After Vicious Daylight Attack in NYC
A Virginia Democrat Just Proved His Party Doesn't Understand Rural America
Illegal Alien in Custody Following Horror Attack on Mom, Three-Year-Old Girl at San...
Australia and Sweden Teamed Up for the Most Unnecessary Scientific Study of All...
Search and Rescue Efforts Underway After Massive Tornado Strikes Vance Air Force Base...
A 21st Century Declaration of American Ideals
Exposed: A Suspected Sex Trafficking Operation Steps From NBC, Fox News in Midtown...
Trump Cuts FDA Red Tape on Ibogaine: Veterans Finally Get a Real Shot...
Kansas Legislature Shows Rest of Nation How to Get Good Things Done
Tipsheet

The White House's 'Contingency Plan' for a Rail Strike Doesn't Sound Like a Plan

The White House's 'Contingency Plan' for a Rail Strike Doesn't Sound Like a Plan
AP Photo/Evan Vucci

In Tuesday's White House press briefing, Karine Jean-Pierre failed to provide much reassurance for American citizens or businesses eyeing the looming threat of a rail worker strike that is shaping up to be something of a repeat of the Biden administration's previous mismanagement of U.S. port backlogs and infant formula shortages. 

Advertisement

As Vespa explained on Tuesday morning, potential rail disruption is "another looming economic crisis that could strike hard this week," one that "could cost the US economy billions and disrupt virtually all commercial and passenger traffic."

So what does the White House have to say about the situation? Well, according to Biden's press secretary, they're working on it, and have been for months, and the most they have to show is a contingency plan that Jean-Pierre mentioned without any concrete details. 

"We have made crystal clear to the interested parties the harm that American families, businesses, and farmers and communities would experience if they were not to reach a resolution," Jean-Pierre said while emphasizing that it's "incredibly important" for the rail unions and rail companies to remain at the negotiating table. But, the deadline for negotiations is midnight on Friday, and if the two unions that are still holding out don't reach something by then, their employees — plus all the employees of ten other unions in an act of solidarity — will go on strike. 

"The president has been involved in this," Jean-Pierre continued — as if that's supposed to be reassuring — and the cabinet secretaries have been involved since the early days of this effort" that she said date back to earlier this spring. 

Advertisement

Those cabinet secretaries? Marty Walsh (Labor), Tom Vilsack (Agriculture), and Pete Buttigieg (Transportation). Those with a memory longer than about 5 minutes will remember that Buttigieg was at the helm as the Biden administration's previous supply chain crisis developed, then stepped away for a family leave that was only discovered when reporters started asking questions at the Department of Transportation. His — as well as the rest of the Biden administration's — ability to handle transportation crises deserves a significant amount of healthy skepticism. 

So, what has the White House come up with as its plan should a deal not be reached by midnight Friday? Karine Jean-Pierre called it a "contingency plan" which may be the understatement of the year. A U.S. rail shutdown is not merely a contingency, it's an estimated $2 billion-per-day cost to an economy that's in a recession and still dealing with 40-year-high inflation.

Offering limited details, Jean-Pierre said that the White House is "working with other modes of transportation including the shippers and truckers, air freight, to see how they can step in and keep goods moving in case of this rail shutdown."

Advertisement

Really? The White House's plan to prevent another supply chain and economic crisis is just taking everything that's transported by rail — some 1.7 billion tons across nearly 140,000-miles of track annually — and put it on boats, planes, and 18-wheelers? In something of a doth protest too much moment, Jean-Pierre reiterated "we're really working with and trying to figure out with other modes of transportation how to move forward." Right. 

So, according to the White House, the president and his administration have been working on averting a strike that is now just days away since early spring? Despite the "hundreds of phone calls and meetings with unions and companies" Jean-Pierre tried to use as proof that the Biden administration was "directly engaged," in "constant communication," and on top of things, it just sounds like a repeat of the formula shortage. 

And while Jean-Pierre might think that bragging about all the communication and "direct" engagement the Biden administration has had in the negotiations between rail companies and rail unions is proof of working to help the American people, all it does is make the White House culpable if a deal isn't reached by midnight Friday.

Advertisement

"A shutdown would have a tremendous impact on our supply chains, as you all know, it's going to have ripple effects into our overall economy," Jean-Pierre added in response to another question on the potential rail strike, again admitting that the White House knows it's toying with another potential disaster just a few weeks before the midterm elections. "A shutdown is not acceptable," she added.

Well, if talks break down or a deal isn't reached by midnight, it's going to be Joe Biden and his administration's fingerprints that are all over the latest economic failure. You can be sure that if a strike kicks off over the weekend, the Biden administration will quickly change its tune to pretend it never had a role in the negotiations. Then, the scrambling will begin again to make excuses for why it wasn't better prepared for the disruptions a strike will cause. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement