Here's Scott Jennings' Take on Trump's White House Correspondents' Association Dinner Spee...
We Might Have Some More Ballot Drama in Maine
How Alaska Is Cleaning Up Its Voter Rolls
Former MSNBC Analyst Admits Republicans Were Right About This Regarding Our Elections
GOP Sends Letter to NJ Governor: What the Hell Happened to Your Voter...
Democrats Do Not Speak for All Women
The Kind of People Who Run for Government Office
Black-On-White Crime Remains Epidemic
On National Parents’ Day, Remember: Parents—Not the State—Know and Love Their Children Bes...
The Unlikely Incubators of Liberty
The Faculty Lounge Is Where the Rot Started
We Now Have the Truth About That Viral ICE Story That Sparked Massive...
The Process to Replace Graham Platner Is Already Off to a Rough Start...
The Conservative Case for American Cement
JD Vance Proves He's Not Ready for Prime Time
Tipsheet

Border Patrol Union’s Parent Organization Backs Anti-ICE Riots Targeting Its Own Members

Border Patrol Union’s Parent Organization Backs Anti-ICE Riots Targeting Its Own Members
AP Photo/Evan Vucci

In a questionable move, the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE)—the parent union representing thousands of U.S. Border Patrol agents—has come under fire for reportedly sponsoring the radical “No Kings” protests, a group known for its aggressive anti-ICE stance. In other words, the AFGE is openly protesting against its own members. 

Advertisement

The AFGE partnered with NoKings.org to promote protests that escalated into widespread anti-ICE riots and civil unrest nationwide. Demonstrators were seen carrying vulgar, anti-law enforcement signs with messages like “F*** Border Patrol” and “F*** the Migra,” a derogatory Spanish slang term for Border Patrol. According to its own website, AFGE represents approximately 100,000 federal law enforcement officers, including Border Patrol agents, Federal Protective Service officers, and TSA agents.

The National Border Patrol Council (NBPC), which represents frontline Border Patrol agents, has strongly criticized the AFGE and its political positions on immigration. However, a 1967 Department of Justice (DOJ) ruling mandates that Border Patrol agents must be represented by the AFGE, leaving the NBPC with no alternative representation.

In a statement, the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) clarified its affiliation with the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), which is tied to the AFL-CIO. The NBPC explained that attempting to sever ties with AFGE—or even discussing such a move—would trigger severe repercussions. These include losing control of union assets, forfeiting legal insurance and exclusive representation status, and being placed under trusteeship, with non-Border Patrol AFGE officials taking over union operations. The NBPC also noted that AFL-CIO dues, paid by AFGE, amounted to $0.65 per member per month as of 2019.

Advertisement

Related:

BORDER PATROL

The NBPC said that while it opposes AFGE and AFL-CIO’s promotion of illegal immigration, it cannot break away from the council without facing serious consequences. Instead, the NBPC said it must work from within to push for change by persuading other AFGE councils and AFL-CIO-affiliated unions to oppose pro-illegal immigration efforts.

Editor’s Note: FINAL HOURS! Don't miss out on our massive Patriot Sale! Get 74% off a VIP membership with promo code POTUS47.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement