CBP and ICE Chiefs Faced Off Against Unhinged Dems...and One Said the Quiet...
Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has Been Telling Some Weird Lies About His Ancestor and...
DOJ Charges Two Men in $120 Million Adult Day Care Fraud Scheme
This GOP Governor Just Shot Down a Bill That Would Have Banned Biological...
Chewing the Fat on the Left's 'Body Positivity' Flip Flop
National Nurses Union Calls for the Abolition of ICE
While Her Senate Rivals Campaign Statewide, Haley Stevens Hides From Voters
Delaware Smacked Down for Trying to Enforce Law, Ignoring Injunction
Dow 50,000: A Supply-Side Miracle
Tensions Rise At the White House's New Religious Liberty Commission as One Member...
Mike Johnson Blasts Mamdani's DOH for Creating a ‘Global Oppression’ Group Focused on...
Kentucky Senate Candidate Andy Barr Endorses Pro-Amnesty Book Despite Pledging to Be ‘Amer...
Even CNN Knows That Democrats Are on the Wrong Side of the Voter...
Ken Paxton Notches Immigration Win As Premier Community for Illegals Pays Out $68...
This Congressman's Inquiry Into Bad Bunny's Explicit Performance Has the Libs Screaming
Tipsheet

Did Lloyd Austin Unlawfully Rescind the 9/11 Terrorist Plea Deal?

AP Photo/Kevin Wolf

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin may not have had the authority to revoke the plea deal he promised the 9/11 terrorist attack masterminds. 

In July, Austin decided last-minute to rescind a plea deal for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin Attash, and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi after it triggered nationwide outrage.

Advertisement

Austin caved to political pressure after Democrats feared the plea agreements would make the Biden-Harris Administration look bad— especially for Vice President Kamala Harris as she campaigns for the 2024 election. 

The terrorist attack masterminds initially agreed to plead guilty to a slew of charges, including the murder of 3,000 people, in exchange for removing the death penalty.

However, a New York Times report suggests a judge will likely shoot down Austin’s decision to revoke a plea deal, saying it was “Too late in the game.” 

According to the judge’s order, he directed all parties to determine whether Austin’s action was lawful.

In a Sept. 6 court filing, the U.S. government claimed Austin “had ample authority under the relevant statutes, rules, and regulations” to rescind the plea deals that Convening Authority for Military Commissions Susan Escallie made. 

Appointed by Austin, Escallie is “empowered to convene military commissions, refer charges to trial, negotiate pre-trial agreements, and review records of trial.”

Advertisement

Typically, once the convening authority approves a plea deal, it is a “done deal” and cannot be revoked. However, in August, Austin withdrew her “authority in the above-referenced case to enter into a pre-trial agreement and reserve such authority to myself.” 

The NYT noted that defense attorneys argue that the plea agreements are still valid and that Austin rescinded them after the fact. 

Gary Barthel, founder of the Military Law Center, told the Daily Caller News Foundation that the judge could reinstate the plea deals due to Austin’s “misuse” of his authority to revoke the agreement after it had already been made as being “undue influence.” 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos