The National Guard Is Being Deployed in New Orleans for an Extended Period....
Supreme Court Hands Trump White House Brutal Defeat on National Guard Deployments
So, That's the Real Story Behind the Deported Chinese National That the NYT...
MS Now Host Wonders Why Trump Was So Against Releasing the Epstein Files....
Recognizing Media Malfunctions With the Heckler Awards - Part 1: The Industry Technical...
This Heartwarming Story Out of North Carolina Will Put You in the Christmas...
Will a Judge Toss the Hannah Dugan Verdict? Her Defense Team Hopes So
Sen. Kennedy Defends Trump on Venezuelan Oil Seizures: Sanctions Mean Nothing If You...
What Does it Mean to Be an American? Vivek Ramaswamy's AmericaFest Speech
Seattle Public Health Officials Give Hilarious Advice to Solve 'Toilet Rat' Epidemic
Democrat Mayor Says City Residents Might Kill ICE Agents Who Enforce the Law...
Texas AG Ken Paxton Isn't Backing Down Against 'Radical Islamic Infiltration'
Islamic Terrorist Gets Life in Jail for '9/11 Style' Plot
HEARTBREAKING: Islamic Arsonists Destroy Christmas Display at Catholic Church in the West...
Koreans Dislike Successful American Tech Companies So Much, They’re Willing to Risk US-Kor...
Tipsheet

Did Lloyd Austin Unlawfully Rescind the 9/11 Terrorist Plea Deal?

AP Photo/Kevin Wolf

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin may not have had the authority to revoke the plea deal he promised the 9/11 terrorist attack masterminds. 

In July, Austin decided last-minute to rescind a plea deal for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin Attash, and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi after it triggered nationwide outrage.

Advertisement

Austin caved to political pressure after Democrats feared the plea agreements would make the Biden-Harris Administration look bad— especially for Vice President Kamala Harris as she campaigns for the 2024 election. 

The terrorist attack masterminds initially agreed to plead guilty to a slew of charges, including the murder of 3,000 people, in exchange for removing the death penalty.

However, a New York Times report suggests a judge will likely shoot down Austin’s decision to revoke a plea deal, saying it was “Too late in the game.” 

According to the judge’s order, he directed all parties to determine whether Austin’s action was lawful.

In a Sept. 6 court filing, the U.S. government claimed Austin “had ample authority under the relevant statutes, rules, and regulations” to rescind the plea deals that Convening Authority for Military Commissions Susan Escallie made. 

Appointed by Austin, Escallie is “empowered to convene military commissions, refer charges to trial, negotiate pre-trial agreements, and review records of trial.”

Advertisement

Typically, once the convening authority approves a plea deal, it is a “done deal” and cannot be revoked. However, in August, Austin withdrew her “authority in the above-referenced case to enter into a pre-trial agreement and reserve such authority to myself.” 

The NYT noted that defense attorneys argue that the plea agreements are still valid and that Austin rescinded them after the fact. 

Gary Barthel, founder of the Military Law Center, told the Daily Caller News Foundation that the judge could reinstate the plea deals due to Austin’s “misuse” of his authority to revoke the agreement after it had already been made as being “undue influence.” 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos