FBI Had to Slap Down CBS News Over This Fake News Piece About...
A Dance Team Did Not Just Do This Regarding the ICE Shooting in...
Ilhan Omar Just Called on Democrats to Abolish This Agency
The Deplorable Treatment of Afghan Women Is a Glimpse Into Our Future
In Record Time, Voters Are Regretting Electing Socialist Mamdani
Steven Spielberg Flees California Before Its Billionaire Wealth Tax Fleeces Him
Why Does 'Trans' Minnesota Politician Finke Oppose Restricting Adult Websites?
Here's What President Trump Had to Say About the Supreme Court's Tariff Ruling
Oklahoma Bill Would Mandate Gun Safety Training in Public Schools
Here Is the Silver Lining to the Supreme Court's Tariff Ruling
CA Bends The Knee, Newsom Will Now Mandate English Proficiency Tests for Truck...
Will The Trump Administration Be Forced to Pay Back Billions in Tariff Revenue?
Justice Thomas Blasts The Supreme Court Majority for Striking Down Trump’s Tariffs
Kansas Engineer Gets 29 Months for $1.2M Kickback Scheme on Nuclear Weapons Projects
DOJ Files Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ohio Healthcare Company
Tipsheet

How Nebraska Could Change the Outcome of the Election

How Nebraska Could Change the Outcome of the Election
AP Photo

Nebraska has renewed efforts to make it a winner-takes-all electoral votes state after Gov. Jim Pillen (R-NE) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) met with more than 20 Republican state senators to discuss changing the state’s electoral college votes. 

Advertisement

Nebraska and Maine are the only states that do not follow the winner-take-all system for electoral votes. Instead, it gives two electoral votes based on the statewide result and votes allocated by who wins certain congressional districts. In Nebraska, two of the five electoral votes are awarded to the candidate who wins the most votes statewide, while the other three go to the winners of each of the state’s three congressional districts. 

In recent months, the red state has attempted to secure a move that would award former President Donald Trump an extra electoral college vote in what will be a tight race. The extra vote could secure the election for the 45th president. 

Meanwhile, Maine Democrats have tried to counteract the Nebraska legislature’s move. However, it appears Democrats missed the deadline. 

“I want the law changed. I’ve made no qualms about it,” Graham said. “They were open-minded. I said: ‘Listen, it’s your decision to make. It comes down to one electoral vote. I want you to understand what that one vote would mean.’”

With the 2024 race looking to be tight, each electoral vote will be critical for the presidential candidates. Getting 270 delegates for either candidate will come down to just a few states.

Nebraska Sen. Merv Riepe (R-NEB) said he spoke to Trump, who supported changing the law. 

Advertisement

Related:

2024 ELECTION

Earlier this year, Gov. Jim Pillen (R-NEB) and Trump endorsed a proposal to change the state’s Electoral College to a winner-take-all system. Ultimately, it was struck down. 

However, Pillen announced efforts to call for a special legislative session that would reconsider the proposal if the GOP had 33 votes to make the change. 

Although Nebraska is predominantly a Republican state, its 2nd Congressional District, which surrounds Omaha, has historically gone to Democrats, including former President Obama in 2008 and President Joe Biden in 2020. 

If the law were to be changed, and Vice President Kamala Harris wins Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. In contrast, Trump wins North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada, they would tie at 269 electoral votes. However, if the change does not happen, and the same election results as explained above occur, and she takes Omaha, Harris would secure enough votes to be the next president, 270-268.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement