Joe Scarborough Really Stretched the Limits of Sanity With This Take on the...
Fiasco: NYC GOP Councilwoman Just Obliterated Mamdani Over the City's Shambolic Winter Sto...
CBS News Peddled Fake News About Bad Bunny and ICE Post-Super Bowl Performance
Yes, This Was the Best Response to John Kasich's Tweet About the Super...
A Bar Patron Had a Total Meltdown During the Super Bowl. The Reason...
Maybe We Should Be Glad Bad Bunny Performed in Spanish
Notice Where This Ex-ESPN Reporter's Attempt to Mock Conservatives Over Bad Bunny Laughabl...
Why Are Americans Fleeing Blue States for Red States?
A Maryland Squatter Walks Free — and Here's What Her Attorney Had...
AWFUL Who Harassed Yoga Studio Employees Over ICE Earned Herself a Ban
Deadline Tries to Guilt Trip John Lithgow for Starring in HBO's 'Harry Potter'...
Mayor Mamdani Becomes First NYC Leader to Skip Archbishop Installation in Almost a...
When Canadians Were Actually Funny
The Student ICE Walkouts Are a Troubling Reminder of How Revolutionaries Are Made
America’s Security Doesn’t End at the Ice’s Edge
Tipsheet

How Nebraska Could Change the Outcome of the Election

AP Photo

Nebraska has renewed efforts to make it a winner-takes-all electoral votes state after Gov. Jim Pillen (R-NE) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) met with more than 20 Republican state senators to discuss changing the state’s electoral college votes. 

Advertisement

Nebraska and Maine are the only states that do not follow the winner-take-all system for electoral votes. Instead, it gives two electoral votes based on the statewide result and votes allocated by who wins certain congressional districts. In Nebraska, two of the five electoral votes are awarded to the candidate who wins the most votes statewide, while the other three go to the winners of each of the state’s three congressional districts. 

In recent months, the red state has attempted to secure a move that would award former President Donald Trump an extra electoral college vote in what will be a tight race. The extra vote could secure the election for the 45th president. 

Meanwhile, Maine Democrats have tried to counteract the Nebraska legislature’s move. However, it appears Democrats missed the deadline. 

“I want the law changed. I’ve made no qualms about it,” Graham said. “They were open-minded. I said: ‘Listen, it’s your decision to make. It comes down to one electoral vote. I want you to understand what that one vote would mean.’”

With the 2024 race looking to be tight, each electoral vote will be critical for the presidential candidates. Getting 270 delegates for either candidate will come down to just a few states.

Nebraska Sen. Merv Riepe (R-NEB) said he spoke to Trump, who supported changing the law. 

Advertisement

Related:

2024 ELECTION

Earlier this year, Gov. Jim Pillen (R-NEB) and Trump endorsed a proposal to change the state’s Electoral College to a winner-take-all system. Ultimately, it was struck down. 

However, Pillen announced efforts to call for a special legislative session that would reconsider the proposal if the GOP had 33 votes to make the change. 

Although Nebraska is predominantly a Republican state, its 2nd Congressional District, which surrounds Omaha, has historically gone to Democrats, including former President Obama in 2008 and President Joe Biden in 2020. 

If the law were to be changed, and Vice President Kamala Harris wins Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. In contrast, Trump wins North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada, they would tie at 269 electoral votes. However, if the change does not happen, and the same election results as explained above occur, and she takes Omaha, Harris would secure enough votes to be the next president, 270-268.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos