Chuck Schumer Is Toast
Kash Patel Posts Update on Investigation into Trump Would-Be Assassin Thomas Crooks
Why Dems Had to Delete This Tweet About Trump and Jeffrey Epstein
This Hunter Biden Interview Was Totally Out of Control
Top Republican Went Scorched Earth on Dems Over Failed Schumer Shutdown Circus
Hemp Industry Gearing Up for Battle After Spending Bill Ban
Democrats Are Why Our Healthcare Costs Keep Rising
Here's What the Creators of Satirical 'Anne Frank' Musical Don't Want You to...
Federal Appeals Court Halts DOT Rules Limiting Immigrant Commerical License Access
Before It’s Too Late: The West Must Prepare for Iran’s Next Crisis
Democrat Denial of Reality in the Age of Video
The Shutdown Isn’t the Crisis. Congressional Spending Is.
Congress Squandered $838 Million Subsidizing Intercity Buses in Fiscal Year 2025
Don't Drop the Call on America's First Responders
Newsom’s Veto of Hormone Therapy Bill Signals Fiscal Caution, Not Ideological Shift
Tipsheet

Newsom Makes False Claim About Tennessee Town Banning 'Being Gay In Public'

AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes

Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA.) falsely accused a Tennessee town of banning homosexuality in public. 

This week, Newsom took to social media to highlight a story published by the New Republic. However, he missed the mark of mentioning the actual facts of the article. 

Advertisement

"A city in Tennessee has banned being gay in public. This is just the beginning," Newsom wrote on X, linking to the New Republic story that claims the city council of Murfreesboro, Tenn., "passed [an] ordinance essentially prohibiting homosexuality in public to try to ban library books."

However, in reality, the city only passed an ordinance that banned "indecent behavior," including lewd behavior, nudity, sexual conduct, and "indecent materials and events."

The ordinance does not mention homosexuality but to "promote public decency, maintain family-friendly environments in public places, and protect against harm to minors from public expressions appealing to prurient interests or that are offensive to prevailing community standards."

The New Republic's claim that the ordinance bans "being gay" only applies to a cross reference of a 1949 city code provision that defines sexual conduct as "acts of masturbation, homosexuality, sexual intercourse, or physical contact with a person's clothed or unclothed genitals."

In October, the city's lawmakers changed that provision to remove the mention of homosexuality— a month before the New Republic ran its story. 

Advertisement

Related:

GAVIN NEWSOM

Newsom's tweet was "community noted," which technically is a community-run fact-checking service by the platform. 

Many users criticized the Democrat's post, saying he "intentionally" misled the public. 

Newsom's false tweet comes a month after he signed legislation that requires K-12 California students to take internet media literacy courses that teach how "online misinformation has posed risks to international peace, interfered with democratic decisionmaking, and threatened public health."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement