Trump Pubishes New Details About Retaking the Panama Canal
Post-Assad Syrian Christians Rise Up to Celebrate Christmas
Since When Did We Republicans Start Being Against Punishing Criminals?
Poll Shows Americans Are Hopeful For 2025, and the Reason Why Might Make...
Protecting the Lives of Murderers, but Not Babies
Wishing for Santa-Like Efficiency in the USA
Bill Maher Has a Harsh Message for Liberals Who Cut Off Their Families...
Remember the Man Accused of Murdering Four University of Idaho Students? Well...
Russia Launched an ‘Inhumane’ Christmas Day Attack on Ukraine
Celebrating the Miracle of Redemption
A Letter to Jesus
Here's Why Texas AG Ken Paxton Sued the NCAA
Of Course NYT Mocks the Virgin Mary
What Is With Jill Biden's White House Christmas Decorations?
Jesus Fulfilled Amazing Prophecies
Tipsheet

Judge Cannon Denies Jack Smith's Gag Order Request

AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

Special Counsel Jack Smith requested a gag order against former and potentially future President Donald Trump on Friday night, as part of his classified documents case. On Tuesday, Judge Aileen Cannon struck down the order, and even chastised prosectors in the process. She also denied a request from Trump attorneys to censure prosecutors in the process, which attorneys filed in response to the gag order, The Hill reported.

Advertisement

Cannon's order denied the gag order request "for lack of meaningful conferral...The Court finds the Special Counsel’s pro forma 'conferral' to be wholly lacking in substance and professional courtesy." Her order also later noted that "Any future, non-emergency motion brought in this case--whether on the topic of release conditions or anything else--shall not be filed absent meaningful, timely, and professional conferral."

"It should go without saying that meaningful conferral is not a perfunctory exercise. Sufficient time needs to be afforded to permit reasonable evaluation of the requested relief by opposing counsel and allow for adequate follow-up discussion as necessary about the specific factual and legal basis underlying the motion," Cannon's order also read. "This is so even when a party 'assume[s]' the opposing party will oppose the proposed motion [583-1], and it applies with additional force when the relief sought--at issue for the time in this proceeding and raised in a procedurally distinct manner than in cited cases--implicates substantive and/or Constitutional questions."

It was revealed last Tuesday in an unsealed request from Trump's attorneys that the FBI had been authorized to use "deadly force" on the August 8, 2022, raid of Mar-a-Lago. Trump was not home at the time. Upon learning of such authorization, Trump sent out Truth Social posts as well as multiple campaign emails, including one mentioning that "Joe Biden was locked & loaded ready to take me out & put my family in danger."

Advertisement

Julie Kelly, in sharing the order, mentioned that she had predicted the move from Cannon.

Kelly also shared emails between Trump's attorneys and prosecutors about the timing of the order. "You did not even bother to inform the Court that you reached out to us for a 'meet and confer' at 5:30pm on Friday night of Memorial Day weekend before filing the motion at 8 p.m.," the email from Todd Blanche to David Harbach points out. 

"I'm confused as to why you think we could not meaningfully meet and confer about a path forward short of a motion. You did not even bother to inform us of the posts/fundraising emails that gave you all concern until 20 minutes before you filed the motion. We would have been more than willing to discuss with you your concerns prior to filing the motion," Blanche continued. 

"You had an agenda and you stuck to that agenda. It is not surprising, but still disappointing," he also charged. 

Advertisement

Judge Cannon indefinitely postponed the trial earlier this month, as Spencer covered at the time. That trial had been set to start on May 20, 2024.

Such an order comes as closing arguments are taking place in the hush money criminal trial where Trump is also the defendant. A verdict could come down tonight, but also later this week. Legal experts, including Professor Jonathan Turley, believe the most likely outcome is a hung jury.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement