Democrats Are Obsessed With White Men
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 308: ‘Fear Not' New Testament – Part 3
Iran Did Not Get the Memo
An Ambitious Bible-Reading Plan
Family As Communion: Familiaris Consortio
Who Wins in the Trump Economy? American Families!
President Trump Is Running a Tight Ship and Giving the Deep State a...
New York City Cannot Afford Democratic Socialism
Feds Indict Six More in Venezuelan Gang's High-Tech ATM Heist – Total Hits...
Michigan Auto Dealer Management Firm Pays $1.5M to Settle PPP Fraud Claims
Here's How Mamdani's Snow Shoveling Program Is Reveals the Leftist Lie on Voter...
Toxic Chemical Poured on Trump-Kennedy Center Ice Rink, Performance Canceled
Lawmakers Probe Potomac River Sewage Spill
Ukrainian Man Ran 'Upworksell.com' to Sell Stolen Identities for Overseas IT Workers, Cour...
The DOJ Has Canned the Most Liberal Immigration Judge in America
Tipsheet

Oops: Ron Klain's Twitter Habit Finally Caught Up With Him

Oops: Ron Klain's Twitter Habit Finally Caught Up With Him
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain's tweets are often a sight to behold due to their hilarious spin. His Twitter habits, though, look to have caught up with him. The U.S. Office of Special Counsel on Wednesday sent a letter indicating that Klain violated the Hatch Act when earlier this year, he retweeted Strike PAC, which aims to elect Democrats, from his official account.

Advertisement

Noting the retweet, American First Legal (AFL) June 1 sent a request for the Special Counsel to investigate, which prompted the investigation and release of the letter. As a press release of theirs explains, with original emphasis:

The Hatch Act prohibits government employees from using their official authority or influence for electioneering or partisan political purposes. The Act further prohibits executive branch officials and employees from knowingly soliciting political contributions from any person. According to the OSC’s guidance, executive branch officials “may not use a social media account designated for official purposes to post or share messages directed at the success or failure of a political party, candidate in a partisan race, or partisan political group.”

The letter from Ana Galindo-Marrone, the chief of the Hatch Act Unit, makes clear that an "employee would violate these prohibitions while using social media by, for example, engaging in political activity on an official account or liking, sharing, or retweeting a post that solicits political contributions," as Klain did. 

Advertisement

In addition to the political nature of the tweet in question, Strike PAC's Twitter bio communicates a clear political preference. "Creating winning Democratic messaging & branding. Democrats Deliver. THIS.NOT THIS. Pro-democracy. Female-founded. Good trouble," the bio reads. Their Twitter page also urges people to donate to them via Act Blue.

Galindo-Marone's letter has more as well:

Strike PAC is a partisan political group, and according to its website, it “supports  campaign finance reform and will help elect Democrats who support these vital policies.” It also  has a “nationalized strategy” aimed at promoting the Democratic Party by “tell[ing] stories of how Democrats deliver on their promises to improve the lives of voters.” In this vein, Strike  PAC’s message thanking President Biden served to further the group’s nationalized strategy of  promoting Democrats as the party that delivers on its promises to voters. By retweeting this  message, Mr. Klain used his official Twitter account to promote a partisan political group’s  interests and, therefore, OSC has concluded that he violated the Hatch Act’s use of official  authority prohibition.  

In addition, Strike PAC’s tweet constituted a solicitation for political contributions  because it encouraged others to buy the group’s merchandise. A political contribution is defined  as any gift, subscription, loan, advance, or deposit of money or anything of value, made for any  political purpose (i.e., to promote or oppose a partisan political group).4 The sale of Strike  PAC’s merchandise supports the group’s objective of electing Democrats, and so the purchase  price is a political contribution for purposes of the Hatch Act. Thus, Strike PAC’s tweet solicited  political contributions, and because Mr. Klain retweeted this message, he also violated the Hatch  Act’s solicitation prohibition.   

Advertisement

As the AFL press release also highlights, Klain's violation reeks of hypocrisy:

During President Donald Trump’s Administration, Klain tweeted in Feb. 2018 that “using your WH title in a press release advocating the President’s reelection is ILLEGAL.” It is clear Klain is well familiar with the Hatch Act and its restrictions, including the proper use of official government social media accounts.That he would use the pulpit of the White House to push partisan political activity on social media, including hawking merchandise for a partisan PAC, is troubling.

The tweet in question from Klain's personal account is still up.

Because Klain deleted the retweet once he was informed of the violation, he will not face disciplinary action and the matter is closed, the letter indicated in its conclusion. If Klain engages in such activity in the future, though, "OSC would consider such activity to be a willful and knowing violation of the  law that could result in disciplinary action."

"Hatch Act" has been trending over Twitter on Thursday as a result of Klain's violation. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement