I'm Stunned USA Today Published This Op-Ed From a Dem About Trump's State...
This Always Happens With These Anti-ICE Stories in the Media
This State's Lawmakers Are Pushing a Bill That Would Ban Facial Recognition Technology
Top Baton Rouge Aide Indicted for Stealing Taxpayer Funds in 'Kickback' Scheme
This Is What Marco Rubio Said When Asked About North Korea
What Will Stop the Iranian Regime's Oppression and Murder of Its People?
The Media Once Scolded Us for Using a Certain Label They Now Love
Illegal Alien Hurt Three Kids While Evading Arrest. Guess Who the Mayor Blames.
California Dems Took Nearly $1B From a Solar Panel Project to Build a...
Vice President Vance Destroyed Tony Evers for Refusing to Help Clean Up Fraud...
JD Vance Says There Is ‘No Chance’ of Prolonged War as US Warships...
Here's How Mamdani's Snow Shoveling Program is Going
Steve Hilton's CalDOGE Says It Uncovered Over $900M in State Fraud in Second...
What the World Needs Now
Illinois Pair Convicted in $5 Million Multistate Pyramid Scheme Case
Tipsheet

Supreme Court Schedules Oral Arguments for Challenges to Biden's Vaccine Mandate

Supreme Court Schedules Oral Arguments for Challenges to Biden's Vaccine Mandate
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Less than a week after the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated President Joe Biden's vaccine mandate the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it had scheduled oral arguments on the challenges. The Wednesday night announcement, as reported by Adam Liptak for The New York Times, lays out a special hearing for January 7 to do with two cases, one addressing Biden's vaccine mandate for private employers with 100 or more employees and another to do with requiring employees who work at hospitals that receive federal funds to be vaccinated.

Advertisement

The case to do with Biden's vaccine mandate or regular testing for private employees, with enforcement from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has sought to examine whether it is an overreach of OSHA's authority. The decision from the Sixth Circuit had overturned a previous stay from the Fifth Circuit.

President Biden hinted at such a mandate on September 9, when he announced a vaccine mandate for federal employees and contractors. The actual mandate was announced on November 4, with lawsuits being filed immediately afterwards. The mandate is set to go into effect on January 4. 

Liptak also noted something that may send the Court's critics into a tailspin, depending on how the justices ruled:

The court said it would move with exceptional speed, setting the cases for argument on Friday, Jan. 7. The justices had not been scheduled to return to the bench until the following Monday.

Both sets of cases had been on what critics call the court’s shadow docket, in which the court decides emergency applications, sometimes on matters of great consequence, without full briefing and argument. The court’s decision to hear arguments on the applications may have been a response to mounting criticism of that practice.

Advertisement

The Democratically-controlled Congress has even held hearings condemning the concept of the shadow docket, especially when it comes to cases to do with abortion.

The Court has ruled before without full argument on cases to do with vaccine mandates. Justices, conservative and liberal alike, have failed to stop vaccine mandates from going into effect, sometimes without bringing such requests for relief before the other justices. 

President Biden himself admitted concerns with his vaccine mandates. "I know vaccination requirements are unpopular for many.  They’re not even popular for those who are anxious to get them," he said during his Tuesday address on the Wuhan coronavirus. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement